Man PJ you talk out of your ass sometimes. Berringer designs brakes for frickin' airplanes. No way a 30 year old 500lb disc set-up (even a dual disc) will compare with that. They will stop, and stop very well.
Can't argue the forks -
If it were one of us instead of a TV guy, would you have liked the bike ? Be honest.
Being honest
Nope, I wouldn't have liked it.
Chet Burks interviewed me before first series
I may still end up as an 'expert' on safe motorcycles, if I saw it 'in person I'm sure I could find a lot of things wrong with it.
I'm sure that even with my bad back and recent surgery on my arm I would still be grinding chunks out of all the stuff hanging down
I doubt any of the 'vintage racers' would be able to lap anywhere other than Daytona at any real speed, the exhaust looks way too low and footrests not much better.
I was an MOT tester in Britain and since moving to USA I've seen a LOT or really dangerous stuff which people think is great because it's 'shiny'
Friend used to race CCS, some of the stuff on track wouldn't have been allowed to run if the 'tech inspection' covered safety items
BTW, for aircraft, SAFETY, weight and reliability are paramount importance, that is baically an inside out rotor with low airflow to rear of disc.
Just because it's 'trick' and probably VERY expensive doesn't make it 'better'
Hayes made brakes for aircraft, they were the worst bakes ever fitted to a bike
If you want to criticise my stuff, it's all over the interwebs, I'll even provide links if you want?
One thing, nothing I make is particularly 'shiney'
It is very functional though and as safe as it can be made, I would have no hesitation of actually putting it on a track and trying to see how fast it will go around then compare that to class record for that track.
Third time I've said it, without a fork brace, that bike will put you in serious danger if you try and push it, even with stock fender the front end twists
I was here before he jumped on the bandwagon and I'll be here after he jumps ship for the next fad