I really didn't expect this type of debate when I originally posed the question. Maybe I should have known better
To reiterate, this was the crux of my inquiry...
but some of the bumps and potholes I have encountered recently, have made me wonder if I might not see a bit of improvement/safety out of one of these things.
I wasn't specifically thinking about tank slappers, although that would certainly be something I'd love to avoid. I was wondering if this addition to the bike might generally offer some stability, in both moderate or severe steering situations. It seems that some people feel it could be, so I went ahead and ordered one.
For me, the cost is offset, not only by the potentially increased physical stability, but also by the fact that it may offer a little added peace of mind. Whether I ever encounter the dire situation that absolutely needs it, I feel better knowing it
MIGHT help on such an occasion, or even help with just keeping my steering as tight as it can be, in less severe, day to day riding. I assumed this is why they come with multiple stiffness settings, so that they made aid the steering in a variety of riding conditions.
No bike is immune to this
Then why is it not law to have one?
Delta, fair point. But this begs the questions: Why were seat belts not made mandatory, the minute it became known that they could save lives? Or, more obvious, why are cigarettes still legal?
In this country ( and I would guess many others), laws are not strictly dictated by reason. In fact, it seems there is often a fairly long lag time, between the discovery and the implementation of protective measures (see cigarette question above).
While I can respect your questioning the fact that "luck" be the only force at play ( I am not one to subscribe to superstition), in preventing you from ever having a tank slapper, I wonder if you don't agree, that precaution is a step worth taking?
This makes me think of the example of helmets. I choose a full-faced version, because I hope that it may provide better protection, in the event of a crash. But of course, I have no way of knowing whether said crash would directly effect the front side of my noggin. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't, but I choose to play it on the safer side. But legally, in most States, you are only required to wear ANY helmet, not the proven safest one. Here in the States, for many years, some places did not require a helmet at all. No argument to be made that THAT was clearly not the safest choice.
The trigger has been pulled on this purchase already, thanks to all points of view here. I imagine I'll have a better opinion of whether or not I feel it was worthwhile, in a few months.
Thanks for all the feedback folks. Let's hope we all do another 100,000kms and more, with no tank slapping or any other steering instability.
Scott