Author Topic: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze revisited  (Read 20684 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SohRon

  • She laughs 'til she cries when they call me an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 946
SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze revisited
« on: August 24, 2011, 09:53:49 pm »
I've been using Copper based anti-sieze for my stainless steel case bolts because it has been recommended on this forum (more than once, actually). I recently was made aware of the following discussion (copied from another website) that makes me wonder if this isn't such a good thing to do. Here's the quote; tell me what you think:


"In a galvanic corrosion situation involving aluminum and steel, we're not worried about the steel. The aluminum is the sacrificial metal and will corrode preferentially, protecting the steel. The presence of water is absolutely necessary
for the reaction to occur.

Plated steel bolts (plated with either cadmium or zinc) will afford some protection to the aluminum, but only as long as the plating lasts. It's being used up as it sacrifices itself to protect the aluminum. As soon as the plating is used up, the sacrifice of the aluminum parts to the steel will begin.

The white powdery coating on one of the bolts looks a lot like aluminum oxide. Guess what part is really getting eaten up. That's right, the aluminum case.

Now if you want to really see aluminum go to pieces, get copper involved. Copper eats up aluminum in a situation of dissimilar metals with water involved. Copper based anti-seize should NEVER be used in contact with, or where it can get in contact with aluminum. Use the aluminum powder anti-seize, always.

My knee-jerk reaction recommendation to fix this corrosion problem would be to:

Clean up the existing corrosion. If the steel bolt hasn't been significantly corroded (just light surface corrosion) clean it up and reuse it. If there is any question as to a reduction of the cross area of the bolt due to corrosion, replace it with the proper factory bolt.

Spray the bolt with WD-40 or other anti-corrosive that is compatible with the rubber pieces. (I went out to the garage to look at the mounts and noticed there is a rubber piece in the joint. Like I said, I just got the bike. Vibration isolation part, or seal to exclude water, or both?)

If you've got copper anti-seize where it can get in contact with the aluminum cases, clean it out of there completely.

Use a little RTV to seal the assembly. The basic idea is to get rid of the water incursions into the bolted joint. Without the water, no corrosion.

Blue Loctite on the threads, not copper anything.


304 stainless fasteners are fine with in contact with aluminum. There is a surface passivation involving the chrome oxides that form on the stainless that precludes the formation of a galvanic cell under most conditions.

Wally advises that by just looking at a couple of photos of one component of the problem he really can't offer a professional opinion from such limited information. There may be other factors involved, but the basic premises of keeping the water out and not using copper are sound."

« Last Edit: October 23, 2011, 10:45:16 am by SohRon »
"He slipped back down the alley with some roly-poly little bat-faced girl..."

Assembling my '74 CB550: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=86697.0
Assembly of the Right-hand Switch (a rebuilder's guide):  http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=80532.0
Installing stock 4X4 exhaust: CB500-CB550 K: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=82323.0
CB550 Assembly Manual: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,151576.0.html

Offline lone*X

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,126
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2011, 11:15:29 am »
Very interesting question here.  So I go a googling and find this site.  The chart on this page recommends zinc based anti-sieze for aluminum to steel.   Interesting read.

http://www.sacskyranch.com/antiseize.htm
Lone*X  ( Don )

75 CB550K1  
VTX1800C for two up cruisin.
Several others have come and gone but whose keeping track.
52 years on two wheels and counting.....
"The best safety feature of any motorcycle is the one God put between your ears.  It's also the least utilized"

Offline Greggo

  • Somebody's
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,164
  • Helmets Save Lives. Period.
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2011, 11:18:31 am »
Hmmmm, interesting. 

Offline Rgconner

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 674
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2011, 11:19:35 am »
Very interesting question here.  So I go a googling and find this site.  The chart on this page recommends zinc based anti-sieze for aluminum to steel.   Interesting read.

http://www.sacskyranch.com/antiseize.htm

hah! That place is just a few miles from my house, and less than a mile from where I bought my CB550.

Gonna have to check that out, that looks like good stuff.
1975 CB550K aka "Grease Monkey"

KingCustomCycles.com

  • Guest
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2011, 12:51:10 pm »
Here is the composition chart for the ONLY anti-seize to use where aluminum, steel, and cad plating are involved, It is the industry standard in aviation.  Also says it prevents corrosion in even severe enviroments:

Product Name: Permatex - 133K ANTI-SEIZE LUBRICANT 8OZ
Item No: 80078
Product Type: Lubricant
2. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Component Weight% ACGIH; TLV-TWA OSHA PEL
DISTILLATES (PETROLEUM),
HYDROTREATED HEAVY
NAPHTHENIC
64742-52-5
20-40 Not listed Not listed
DISTILLATES (PETROLEUM),
HYDROTREATED LIGHT
NAPHTHENIC
64742-53-6
20-40 5 mg/m3 TWA ACGIH Not listed
CALCIUM OXIDE
1305-78-8
15-25 2 mg/m3 5 mg/m3
ALUMINIUM POWDER
7429-90-5
<10 1 mg/m3 15 mg/m3
GRAPHITE
7782-42-5
<10 2 mg/m3 15 mppcf
MINERAL OIL
64741-44-2
<5 5 mg/m3 Not listed
« Last Edit: August 25, 2011, 12:53:02 pm by KingCustomCycles.com »

Offline MidnightLamp

  • Wrenchy wrenchy wrench!
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 190
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2011, 01:25:35 pm »
Permatex 133H is commonly available at your local Canadian Tire (or whatever your american equivilent is). Very simmilar to the above, have used it on everything I own (high performance automotive engines and bikes). Works VERY well.

Cheers
'75 CB750 - Racer
'69 CB350 - Racer
'68 Enfield 350/440(flat top) - Steet
'54 Enfield 350 - Resto
'74 Commando 850 - Restomod
'67 Enfield 750 (TT7) - Resto

bollingball

  • Guest
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2011, 01:33:04 pm »
Hey King you want to translate that ??? ???

KingCustomCycles.com

  • Guest
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2011, 01:55:33 pm »
Sure: it has aluminum and graphite in a mineral spirits carrier.

Offline millerza

  • Zach Miller
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 148
  • 750K8 fixing rebuild probs
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2011, 02:37:33 pm »
Anyone had any issues doing this?

Offline Lostboy Steve

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,096
SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2011, 02:39:19 pm »
What king means is it's base is made of mineral spirits. The rest is all metal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1968 Honda Z50
1977 Honda CB550K
2018 Indian Scout

Offline lrutt

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 916
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2011, 04:16:55 pm »
My understanding is that copper AS should only be used on exhaust studs or possibly sparkplugs. Honestly I don't use it on either, just my regular old can of military grade stuff I've been using for 25 years. It's dark and thick as paste but never has let me down.
06 Harley Sporster 1200C, 06 Triumph Scrambler, 01 Ducati Chromo 900, 01 Honda XR650L, 94 Harley Heritage, 88 Honda Hawk GT, 84 Yamaha Virago 1000, 78 Honda 750K w/sidecar, 77 Moto Guzzi Lemans 850, 76 Honda CB750K, 73 Norton 850, 73 Honda Z50, 70 & 65 Honda Trail 90, 70 & 71 Triumph 650s, 65 Honda 305 Dream, 81 Honda 70 Passport, 70 Suzuki T250II, 71 Yamaha 360 RT1B, 77 BMW R75/7, 75 Honda CB550K, 70 Honda CT70

KingCustomCycles.com

  • Guest
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2011, 04:23:15 pm »
1100 series aluminium is copper free, I have no idea what type of aluminum is ground up in there.  We were taught to use it in Airframe and Powerplant school, and every airline, turbine engine company, or aircraft shop I ever worked at used it.  I only came across the copper at NAPA and have seen it in car mechanics tool boxes.  Aluminum is now common in cars but back in the day, copper was OK. I only reference the aircraft use because they are primary constructed of aluminium and the standards to repair and maintain them are stringent to say the least.  To belabor the point a bit further, if a specific antiseize is required, it will specify that in the approved technical data for the specific repair or assembly. 

Offline SohRon

  • She laughs 'til she cries when they call me an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 946
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-seize = disaster???
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2011, 05:05:55 pm »
Thanks for all of the responses; it looks like the copper AS is a major no-no. The zinc based stuff sounds good as zinc is right at the top of the Galvanic Series, being one of the more anodic metals; of course, that's what Honda used on all of the nuts, bolts and washers we use on our bikes.

It's interesting that the Loctite copper AS is specifically recommended for use on aluminum heads:  "Applications: Spark plug threads (especially in aluminum heads, which can strip easily)..."  So we have one "expert" telling us we should never even allow copper AS into the same room with our aluminum heads, while another "expert" recommends it specifically for our aluminum heads. And people wonder why I get confused...

On a Galvanic series chart, copper falls right in the middle between SS and aluminum, meaning that the aluminum will corrode faster than either of the other two, and there are those I've spoken to about this that say the copper added to the SS and aluminum mix may even hasten the demise of the aluminum in a galvanic corrosion condition.

I'm thinking it's not worth the risk; I'm certainly leaning towards the zinc based AS...
"He slipped back down the alley with some roly-poly little bat-faced girl..."

Assembling my '74 CB550: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=86697.0
Assembly of the Right-hand Switch (a rebuilder's guide):  http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=80532.0
Installing stock 4X4 exhaust: CB500-CB550 K: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=82323.0
CB550 Assembly Manual: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,151576.0.html

Offline cwchan

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 227
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2011, 06:30:21 pm »
Aircraft are subject to much more weather & humidity over their lifetimes than our motorcycles.  Remember water must be present for a reaction to occur & it has to get in the threaded hole.  Do stock steel bolts have anti-seize when they come from the factory?

Offline SohRon

  • She laughs 'til she cries when they call me an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 946
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2011, 10:17:14 pm »
Do stock steel bolts have anti-seize when they come from the factory?

Stock bolts are zinc coated, which acts as an anti-corrosion element by being a sacrificial matrial. And the steel itself isn't that reactive with aluminum.

We're talking stainless steel and aluminum, which is a whole 'nother story. Lots of folks (including myself) are replacing their stock bolts with stainless, and that's where the potential problems arise.

All sorts of things may provide the electrolyte necessary for galvanic corrosion, from rain to high humidity to just plain air pollution; if you live near the ocean you're particularly vulnurable. Aluminum will sacrifice itself to stainless in a heartbeat, and that's what we're trying to  avoid.

And, of course, galling (one material smearing onto another) is a particular problem when mixing hardened stainless with soft aluminum; the anti-seize addresses that as well.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2011, 11:09:01 pm by SohRon »
"He slipped back down the alley with some roly-poly little bat-faced girl..."

Assembling my '74 CB550: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=86697.0
Assembly of the Right-hand Switch (a rebuilder's guide):  http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=80532.0
Installing stock 4X4 exhaust: CB500-CB550 K: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=82323.0
CB550 Assembly Manual: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,151576.0.html

Offline trueblue

  • A person who has had many interesting experiences, some of which are true, is known as an
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,124
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #15 on: August 26, 2011, 01:42:46 am »
I have always used nickle anti-sieze on all bolts used in aluminium, unless of course for whatever reason I have used loctite.  If I don't have any nickle anti-sieze, 2nd option is molibdium di-sulfide grease, works just as well and doesn't provide any corrosion issues. ;)
1979 CB650Z
Nothing can be idiot proofed, the world keeps producing better idiots.
Electronic Guages for your SOHC 4

Offline dave500

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,978
  • WHAT?no gravy?
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2011, 03:25:37 am »
ive always used "kopper kote"and never had trouble,,i might try that white zinc sunscreen you put on your nose from now on,and put the "kopper kote"(TM)on my nose and see what chemical reaction i get from my wife?

Offline dave500

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,978
  • WHAT?no gravy?
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2011, 04:00:58 am »
ok my wife just told me to sleep on the couch,i dont get what she had against me using that white zinc sunscreen on my honda bolts?

Offline SohRon

  • She laughs 'til she cries when they call me an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 946
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #18 on: August 26, 2011, 05:43:15 am »
I've been using copper on cars/motorcycles since the 1970s and had no problems... Don't believe theories based upon roofing products...   I would think the chemical engineers at Loctite have a bit more education than your average back yard gear-head extrapolating some unproven theory.

Good on ya', mate! Was waiting to hear from the hyperbolic crowd. The above info is hardly based on "roofing products", or your "average back yard gear-head", but a discussion held with aluminum industry specialists, and since I've brought this up among my engineering friends, they're in complete agreement.

I give you permission to use whatever AS on your bike you want, and the rest of us will stand behind your right to do so.

ok my wife just told me to sleep on the couch

Women just don't understand...
"He slipped back down the alley with some roly-poly little bat-faced girl..."

Assembling my '74 CB550: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=86697.0
Assembly of the Right-hand Switch (a rebuilder's guide):  http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=80532.0
Installing stock 4X4 exhaust: CB500-CB550 K: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=82323.0
CB550 Assembly Manual: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,151576.0.html

Offline dave500

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,978
  • WHAT?no gravy?
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #19 on: August 26, 2011, 05:49:07 am »
oh she unstood alright,,she just didnt want a kopper koted kunt!,,,i knew someone would walk right into that one!
« Last Edit: August 26, 2011, 05:53:27 am by dave500 »

Offline dave500

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,978
  • WHAT?no gravy?
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #20 on: August 26, 2011, 04:42:20 pm »
im snipped already to save on copper.

Offline Kong

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,051
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #21 on: August 26, 2011, 06:35:32 pm »
First off let me tell you I have a lot of experience with corrosion as a result of using stainless fasteners and aluminum devices together with corrosion being the result.  I have also been using coper enhanced high temperature anti-sieze compound.  Where I use compound I don't get corrosion, where I don't use it I do get corrosion.  Oh, I'm talking about a saltwater environment (I have an off-shore fishing boat that I keep down at a place we have on the coast) where corrosion is an every-resent problem.
2002 FXSTD/I  Softail Deuce
2001 Acura (Honda) CL Type-S
1986 Honda Rebel, 450
1978 Honda CB550K
1977 Honda CB550K

Offline crazypj

  • I'm brill, me
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,467
  • first 100,000 miles. 1977 CB550F
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #22 on: August 26, 2011, 06:52:15 pm »
As KONG said, I'm pretty sure that a copper based lube is far superior to no lube at all.
Ordinary grease doesn't work.
 The stainless screws are going into a not particularly good quality alloy, usually with quite a lot of zinc and various other stuff swept off the cutting room floor in the mix
Zinc screws into zinc alloy corrode real quick and lock together.
 I'll continue using WURTH copper grease until the tube runs out then I'll look for alternatives
I fake being smart pretty good
'you can take my word for it or argue until you find out I'm right'

Offline SohRon

  • She laughs 'til she cries when they call me an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 946
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2011, 09:37:14 pm »
Thanks for the replies, guys; this is the kind of stuff I was looking for.

I've heard of others who have been using the copper compound for years with no problems, so I guess there is room for doubt; anecdotal evidence surely has its place.  However, after extensive research and conversations with my engineering contacts (all of whom gave me really strange looks when I mentioned the combination in question), I'm just not going to risk it; why should I when there are plenty of alternatives available?

Thanks, again, for joining in the discussion.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2011, 09:53:01 pm by SohRon »
"He slipped back down the alley with some roly-poly little bat-faced girl..."

Assembling my '74 CB550: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=86697.0
Assembly of the Right-hand Switch (a rebuilder's guide):  http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=80532.0
Installing stock 4X4 exhaust: CB500-CB550 K: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=82323.0
CB550 Assembly Manual: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,151576.0.html

Offline millerza

  • Zach Miller
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 148
  • 750K8 fixing rebuild probs
Re: SS + Aluminum + copper based anti-sieze = disaster???
« Reply #24 on: August 26, 2011, 10:25:38 pm »
ok so im not going to pull out the ones with copper and clean them, but I see no reason I cant start using the silver stuff