Author Topic: 400F rectifier?  (Read 1002 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tory b

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
400F rectifier?
« on: October 30, 2011, 06:07:23 PM »
   I searched "rectifier" and went into overload.So I will just ask.

I have a 75 400F project that I am replacing the wiring harness in do to POs electrical skill(or lack of).
 It is quit a mess with hacked,spliced and melted wires everywhere with a couple toggle switch's thrown in for good measure.
Obviously a new harness is a no brainer.
  Behind the right sidecover,on the frame rearward of the battery is what I believe is the rectifier.It to has been molested and needs replacing,but as I look for a replacement I am coming up with a few differant types for the same model?Whats even more confusing is these all claim to fit CB350,400,500,550,750s through the same year spread,70-78 I think.
  The one on my 1975 CB400F is a vintage square tube looking thing about 2" by 2" with four post inside connected to the wires.
What I see on bikebandits illustration as well as most on EBAY are more of a solid state type with cooling fins.

Are these interchangeable with each other?And is it an acceptable upgrade for my restoration project?
Also,my bike has a "silicone rectifier" about 1/2 inch by 3/8 inch with two terminals.Is this used with both or all three types of rectifiers?
1975 CB400F
1973 CB500
1982 CB900F
1983 GL1100 W/Vetter sidecar

www.vintagericeburners.com

Offline caluser2000

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
Re: 400F rectifier?
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2011, 09:01:05 PM »
Is the old like the one I used to test my bike, cb550F, then yes they are interchangable:

Does it have to be OEM? You  can go a more budget route- http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=12465.300 or alternatively http://www.oregonmotorcycleparts.com/rectifiers3p.html
« Last Edit: October 30, 2011, 09:29:49 PM by caluser2000 »
Every time you set your ass on a bike, you're playing a game of Russian Roulette between yourself and your own stupidity."

Offline Bodi

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,702
Re: 400F rectifier?
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2011, 03:50:32 AM »
That picture in the previous post, although not a 400, shows the OEM rectifier. It's the part mounted but not connected, with its cable and connector hanging loose. I believe all year 400Fs used this type. There are many alternatives, but they don't look the same.

Offline bryanj

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,148
  • CB500 Number 1000036
Re: 400F rectifier?
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2011, 07:54:13 AM »
The small "siicon rectifier" with two terminals is the Starter-Safety-Interlock which stops the starter working unless either the neutral light is on OR the clutch lever is pulled -----That is assuming that all the rest of the electrics is connected correctly AND working.

As to the main rectifier all the years and fours will fit, if you want to keep the original regulator the 400 connectors exit sideways instead of downwards but apart from that thay are all the same----If going combined electronic (Oregon etc) they it don't matter a stuff
Semi Geriatric ex-Honda mechanic and MOT tester (UK version of annual inspection). Garage full of "projects" mostly 500/4 from pre 73 (no road tax in UK).

Remember "Its always in the last place you look" COURSE IT IS YOU STOP LOOKIN THEN!

Offline tory b

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
Re: 400F rectifier?
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2011, 05:02:09 PM »
Yep
Mine looks like the one hanging.
I do have a parts bike left over from my 73 500k.If I understand you all then,that rectidier will plug in and work,but is not correct for a 400F restoration?
 
Is there a functional advantage of the type in my 500s?(They are like the unplugged on in the photo) they look a lot more modern.The one on the 400 looks like it is out of the 50s or something.
1975 CB400F
1973 CB500
1982 CB900F
1983 GL1100 W/Vetter sidecar

www.vintagericeburners.com

Offline caluser2000

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
Re: 400F rectifier?
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2011, 09:21:27 PM »
Personnally I would worry about "correctness" if a component does the job without interfering with other components and it's a reasonable price. If you've got a spare 500 rect you can use it. They both do the same job.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2011, 09:42:24 PM by caluser2000 »
Every time you set your ass on a bike, you're playing a game of Russian Roulette between yourself and your own stupidity."