Over here people are paying 15K plus for Norton Commando's, 12K for old Triumph Bonnies, 15K plus for Tridents, etc etc. I laugh inwardly whenever I see these unreliable , fragile old boat anchors advertised by a seller who's only owned it for a short time but has to sell it due to "ill health". (In other words, owning this POS has made him sick......)
Boat anchor? My 70 Commando is no boat anchor. It has an elec. ignition and new wiring harness. It starts on the first kick. Is it as reliable ad a CB750 Four? Nope. But if set up correctly these can be reliable bikes too.
It all depends on what your definition of "reliable" is mate. If you mean you can hop on your Norton on a nice sunny day, start it with only a couple of kicks, and ride a few miles without anything falling off, then yep, they're reliable. If you mean riding in all weather conditions for hundreds of miles with little or no maintenance like you can with your CB750, then they're definitely not.
When I bought my first CB750 in 1977, a mate bought a new, Commando 850. The first myth that we discovered was that the Norton was not faster, but it went quite well, to be fair. It handled and braked well, but over the 10 months that he owned it, he spent more time on the back of my 750 than he did on his Norton, as it spent a lot of time in the shop having warranty work. (paint lifting on tank around filler, starter motor failure, gearbox issues and 2 blown head gaskets, from memory)
He told me the service manager told him, "You can't ride it like a Jap bike" when the head gasket blew for the second time. He sold it and bought a Kawasaki KZ1000, and lived happily ever after. Cheers, Terry.
