Hi johno ,It's been a long winter , but the weather has recently taken a turn for the better over here
, so it's time to get things done , it's surprising how a bit of sunshine makes all the difference
To be honest if I was to build a top speed bike now ,I'd spend the majority of my time and resources on getting the lowest CD figure possible , the power output of whichever power unit I decided on using would be well down my list of priorities .Streamlining, ie free horspower is definately the way to go
.
Regarding the power output of my 970 motor , I think I calculated that it made 85/90 hp back then, but I may have been way off with that figure
. To be honest I've never thought that the speeds we acheived on that bike were anything special, after all Percy Tait hit 167 on his works Triumph triple at Elvington, and they made ONLY
85 hp , and that was without the benefit of a dustbin fairing etc
.
Regarding your formula , well , where you calculate that a bike needs 200 (I'm assuming here that you mean rwhp) to hit 200mph, I've found is correct for any of the current crop of fast road bikes such as Busa's Z14s etc .However, I'm sure that if someone spent as much time/money on improving the streamlining on any of those bikes, ( rather than just constantly trying to up the rwhp without paying any serious attention to improving the aeros), they could achieve 200mph with less power,and just leave their motor stock
.
Regards Greg "H".