I understand the design for supersport bikes, that see speeds over 180mph and some serious cornering forces in race situations and trackday situations. But What I'm trying to say here is these cb's with those same suspensions on them are not going to see 180mph and the hard cornering a supersports bike is designed/capable of, at least for 99% of the people doing the swap. Supersports bikes are also not the only bikes that use the inverted forks. In 1994, the first sport bike to use them was the GSXR, which at that time had a solid 20mm axle on 20x42x12 bearings. The 97+ suzuki maurader and boulevard use inverted forks, with a 17mm solid steel axle on 17x40x12 bearings. Are these magically not roadworthy either? I agree that a lesser axle design is dangerous, if all of the variables were the same (I.E. high speeds and hard cornering above and beyond the average rider's capabilities)
I also don't agree with saying there's a lack of provision for a fork brace.... while one wouldn't be small or visually simple, it's not impossible to tie the two caliper mounts and/or fender mounts from the lower stantions together over top of the tire. It would just be large and unattractive and aerodynamically unfavorable.