Author Topic: Pods Thread  (Read 134922 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephenwclark

  • Guest
Filter Pods for 72 CB500 four
« Reply #400 on: March 31, 2009, 07:04:46 pm »
Does anyone know where I can find K&N style filters for my 72 CB500 four.


kabuki

  • Guest
Re: Filter Pods for 72 CB500 four
« Reply #402 on: March 31, 2009, 08:53:03 pm »
Those look like the Uni foam filters. I got my K&N's off of the K&N website. Cost is about double what they're asking for the Unis



Offline Kalamazoo

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Filter Pods for 72 CB500 four
« Reply #403 on: April 01, 2009, 07:46:51 pm »
I didnt know that K&N made filters that would fit the 550 or 500, I have always heard of problems with them being to large for the clearance between the carbs and the frame.
Although I didnt do a ton of research on K&N filters just saw the ones I got and picked em up.
M.R.

kabuki

  • Guest
Re: Filter Pods for 72 CB500 four
« Reply #404 on: April 01, 2009, 08:09:55 pm »
The K&N kit is specifically for the CB550. There are no frame clearance issues. I'll try to track down the part number.

Jon

Offline spark

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Which size pods for 1976 550k
« Reply #405 on: April 10, 2009, 10:07:28 am »
What size pods for a 1976 550k?   Sorry I cant' measure cause the bike is a couple hours away right now.  Wont' be able to get to it till next week.  Also I wanted to rebuild the carbs.  Should I get the OEM gasket kit or the K&L gasket kit that comes with more parts?  Thanks  I've been searching for answers and consensus seems to be to get the OEM gaskets but just wanted to get one last opinion before I buy.

Offline tygrant

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 323
Re: Which size pods for 1976 550k
« Reply #406 on: April 10, 2009, 10:28:38 am »
i bought the cheapos on ebay for the air filters, the thing is you gota cut the top of the filter and glue it back on to mekt hem fit on the two outside carbs. i did that on mine and they look factory took about 10 minutes each
1975 CB550F - cafe
2001 YZF-R6
2002 HD fatboy

Offline buffalogt750

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 192
Re: Which size pods for 1976 550k
« Reply #407 on: April 10, 2009, 02:07:52 pm »
You need 39mm pods for a 1976 550k. K&L parts are OK but naturally OEM is better. I have a 1976 550k and also bought cheap Emgo pods. As stated, I had to shorten the outer pods and also modify the choke lever. Both easy jobs. Don't forget you'll have to rejet your carbs if you use pods. You may also find that this is a very touchy subject on this forum.
1976 Honda CB550K   SOLD
1993 Ducati 750 SS
2000 Suzuki Bandit 1200

Offline cafe750

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 583
  • If you can't fix it with a hammer, it's electrical
Re: Which size pods for 1976 550k
« Reply #408 on: April 10, 2009, 02:12:43 pm »
"It's an old motorcycle, the wind is supposed to blow your head around, it's supposed to leak oil, the brakes should suck, and every now and then, it should scare you so bad you piss your pants."



Roy, Washington

Offline spark

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Which size pods for 1976 550k
« Reply #409 on: April 10, 2009, 04:14:17 pm »
It's all right here....
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=29437.0

Ya I saw this link and read through it a few times.  I like that these shorter emgo pods fit but they are only 35mm.  Even though you are only stretching it alittle bit to fit the 39 mm on the 76' 550k , im kinda weary cause I think the rubber boot will eventually crack like I read in a couple other posts.   

Offline Kalamazoo

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Which size pods for 1976 550k
« Reply #410 on: April 10, 2009, 05:42:13 pm »
M.R.

Offline tygrant

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 323
Re: Which size pods for 1976 550k
« Reply #411 on: April 10, 2009, 10:24:38 pm »
This is what I've got, on the exact same bike.
 http://www.speedmotoco.com/shop/product_info.php?products_id=1805&osCsid=jei76l5q4alv1tl1563e46v9b4


im sorry but that is crazy money for pods buy the cheapos and refit the top cap, its a fraction of the cost and the still looks awesome if u need pics or advice feel free to pm me, id be glad to help
1975 CB550F - cafe
2001 YZF-R6
2002 HD fatboy

Offline Kalamazoo

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Which size pods for 1976 550k
« Reply #412 on: April 14, 2009, 09:25:11 pm »
Yeah I realize that is quite a bit of money, however, I received them as a gift so had no problem taking them  :D :D
M.R.

crufork

  • Guest
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #413 on: May 05, 2009, 07:12:56 pm »
so like umm i dont want to be that guy...but umm since i just read this whole thread i think its only fair for me to post at the end haha, even though it hasnt been posted in 7 months. There was a lot of information to read here so remembering if someone said anything about the cb500 but i cant remember. How different are the 550s from the 500s besides the size of the engine, are the cams different? or compression ratios different? Im just wondering because im about to get pods and already have a 4-1 exhaust and with everyone going back and forth from 105s to 120s and so on im just not sure where to start. One shop is telling me to do 110s and go from there but some of you guys are using bigger jets then that so since the 550 is a bigger engine would i use a lower jet then it or is it about the same for them, i mean since the 550 had 38 slow just but the same main jet i figured it would be the same and just tune it the rest of the way. Oh and by the way im new haha...71 cb500 for me

Offline NickC

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 703
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #414 on: May 05, 2009, 07:41:25 pm »
I would recommmend starting a new thread......

Offline Kev Nemo

  • Honda Hacker
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 364
  • http://fallingapartart.com/
    • FallingApartArt
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #415 on: May 06, 2009, 05:23:23 pm »
I guess I'm just lucky. I put EMGO pods on my 78 750k with a cheap mac 4 into 1 and it ran just fine with some 120 main jets. Didn't quite match the 1/4 mile speed and times as tested new but that was more me than the bike. No problem with idle or throttle response. But then again I wasn't looking for more performance just a look so I came out good on both sides of the debate and I saved some weight too. 

how do your plugs look? Mine ran okay with 120s til it warmed up and then it leaned out again (although not as bad as with the stock mains) 127.5 have barely helped. I'm moving up to 130s tonight and I''l report back tomorrow after highway riding.

-'78 cb750k
-4-1 w/ free flow muff
-emgo pods w/ cleaned/synched carbs
-stock ignition
Destroyed by Design since 2009 http://fallingapartart.com/

- '78 CB750k bobtrack

Offline Johnny5

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,593
    • CB350F build thread
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #416 on: May 06, 2009, 07:00:59 pm »
Kev Nemo,

Looks like we have almost the same setup. On my 750K7, Mac 4-1, Emgo pods, I run 130 mains, the needle at 4.5 down on the richest setting, 1.75 turns out on the fuel screw. Bike pulls hard throughout the RPM range.
www.kerosenecycles.com
1971 CB350
1973 CB350F
2006 Harley Springer Classic

Offline Chester345

  • will someday be an...
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 929
  • 76 CB750F
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #417 on: May 06, 2009, 07:07:29 pm »

What is this 'airbox' thing you guys speak of?

Offline buffalogt750

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 192
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #418 on: May 07, 2009, 04:55:37 am »
          Pods?
1976 Honda CB550K   SOLD
1993 Ducati 750 SS
2000 Suzuki Bandit 1200

Offline cudjo

  • CUDJO
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 157
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #419 on: May 07, 2009, 03:24:18 pm »
does anyone run pods on a 78 750F?
I  think that I need the 42mm size, but I cant find any that say they are for the 750F.

Offline Kev Nemo

  • Honda Hacker
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 364
  • http://fallingapartart.com/
    • FallingApartArt
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #420 on: May 08, 2009, 07:03:08 am »
I'm pretty sure your carbs are the same the k model.

So, Mikuni 135 mains seemed to do the trick. Pulls scary hard through every gear, almost as if the gears were shorter. It cruises well now too, without crazy amounts of popping right below 3/4. It'll probably need alittle more tuning, but 135's have made a HUGE difference.
Destroyed by Design since 2009 http://fallingapartart.com/

- '78 CB750k bobtrack

Offline Kev Nemo

  • Honda Hacker
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 364
  • http://fallingapartart.com/
    • FallingApartArt
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #421 on: May 09, 2009, 07:46:31 am »
Well, that difference wasn't so great later on. Let me list the current problems (1978 cb750k-mods listed above):

-Hard starting, even after being run an hour earlier. Starter motor whirs and clicks pretty nasty, so that could be that as well, although the kick start pretty much sucks, too.
-Leaness across powerband
-Lean plugs

I'm going to unwrap the exhaust and check for cracks (which has happened before). If that isn't it, I guess I'll switch out the accelerator diaphragm. The rubber dust boot has been gone for awhile-maybe it got gummed up? It used to leak, now it doesn't-maybe it stopped working?

In any case, I'm getting pretty speed at tearing my bike down and putting it back together (even with a bolt on seat) :-\
Destroyed by Design since 2009 http://fallingapartart.com/

- '78 CB750k bobtrack

Offline cb750fbomb

  • is by no means a
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 647
  • "No hope? See, that's what gives me guts!"
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #422 on: May 09, 2009, 09:32:55 am »
Did anyone ever get that list together of models running pods and the mods to get them running? I've read the whole post again and have searched and can't find data related to my bike and pods. I think I have stock a exhaust with maybe a mac muffler. The mains are 125 and the needles are set one notch down from the top. The PO put pods on it and I don't have a lot of info?
'77 CB750F2
“The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair.”

Offline Kev Nemo

  • Honda Hacker
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 364
  • http://fallingapartart.com/
    • FallingApartArt
Re: pods v standard air box.
« Reply #423 on: May 10, 2009, 08:32:25 pm »
Well, that difference wasn't so great later on. Let me list the current problems (1978 cb750k-mods listed above):

-Hard starting, even after being run an hour earlier. Starter motor whirs and clicks pretty nasty, so that could be that as well, although the kick start pretty much sucks, too.
-Leaness across powerband
-Lean plugs

I'm going to unwrap the exhaust and check for cracks (which has happened before). If that isn't it, I guess I'll switch out the accelerator diaphragm. The rubber dust boot has been gone for awhile-maybe it got gummed up? It used to leak, now it doesn't-maybe it stopped working?

In any case, I'm getting pretty speed at tearing my bike down and putting it back together (even with a bolt on seat) :-\

Unwrapped and no cracks. Guess I'll put down the 50 something dollars and get a new accel pump. If that doesn't solve it, I guess it's time to check electrical crap :-\
Destroyed by Design since 2009 http://fallingapartart.com/

- '78 CB750k bobtrack

Offline TheHun

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 192
Pods that wont make your bike run lean for 77/78 Carbs
« Reply #424 on: May 18, 2009, 08:42:05 am »
Hey guys. Ive been wanting to run pods on my bike for quite some time now....wanted to delete the ugly box...plus easier access to the timing chain adjuster was a plus too.

I've found these on ebay. I am a firm believer in foam filters (lot better than regular filter as far as filtration and flow). Anyways these little gizmos only costs me $40 shipped form HongKong.

For 77-78 CB750  carbs get 42MM SLANT (make sure you get slant, fitment is nice and tight..the slant makes it fit to the bike a lot better) This filter also have a prefilter which will help you greatly...it also shields against sidewind. Also, these filters have an inner metal support...so it wont collapse under WOT.

If you get one...make sure you lube the lip of the filter with some oil or wd40..then..make sure you install the filter from the bottom-up.

I've had this setup for almost a month...wanted to test them before I posted them on here...my spark plugs remained nice and bronzi-brown...no lack of  power...actually lot more pull...plus it sounds good under WOT or just when you play with the throttle.

I would also recommend supporting you carbs, what I mean is that before you take your airbox off, zip tie your carbs to teh frame on both sides...this will keep your carbs nice and firm just like if you had an airbox..just a suggestion for extra insurance.

Here is the link for the filter. I am no way associated with the seller or anything if any of you think that...just want to pass on some good inexpensive filters that do not need extra adjustments (at least on my bike and my experience)

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/38mm-or-42mm-SPONGE-AIR-FILTER-PIT-BIKES-DIRT-BIKES_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQ_trkparmsZQ7c301Q3a1Q7c293Q3a1Q7c294Q3a30QQ_trksidZp4634Q2ec0Q2em14Q2el1262QQhashZitem230139fb41QQitemZ150344432449QQptZMotorcyclesQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
1978 Honda CB750-K

CBR F3 Coils
Kerker 4.1 Header w/ turn down
Maxi-Dwell Ignition
Foam Air Filter Pods
Superbike bars
Starter Delete

CARB CLEANING/REBUILD: http://www.wix.com/TheHun/CarbCleaning-Site

Not Running to Running, doing the work yourself= Priceless