I'm writing on my thread, but I'll add it here,too. I wrote Progressive Suspension about getting fork springs an inch or two shorter to lower my bike. They sent me a .pdf and basically said 'good luck'. The PDF is their spring spec sheet and I'll attach it here, but the take-home message (and one worth discussing here, I think) is that we may have some options at different heights.
the fork kit part number for the 1980 cb650c is 11-1108. Those are 20.75" fork springs, with a 25mm external diameter and 35/50 rate.
The kit part number that I'd look at to lower my fork an inch is 11-1120, which is a 19.75" spring, with a 23" external diameter and 35/50 rate. That kit uses a 2.12 spacer, and I'm not sure what that 2.12 signifies, because some of their kits have 12.00 spacers, and I have a hard time believing someone would just put a foot of PVC in their fork.
The kit part no. I'd look at to lower my fork two inches (thereby making up the 1.6" for my 11.4" shocks and lost half inch to putting on a 16" tire from the 17 that's on there) is 11-1120S, which is 18.75 inches long, same 23mm OD and same 35/50 rate. Shim is n/a in that kit.
Well, maybe I need to think about the 2" drop in front, because if it started out stock in front, then they put on a 17" rear wheel, the front was -.5" (relative to the rear) Then I dropped the rear 1.6". that 1.6 negated the .5" of the 17" rear wheel, making the rear 1.1" shorter than the front.
...
so I'm planning on putting the 16" back on this winter, which would raise the relative height difference to 1.6" again. So I should probably go with lowering the front 1" and think about whether or not to lower the fork through the tripletree for that last half inch.
this is making my head hurt