The SOHC/4 World Tour is in under way.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: paulages on August 27, 2009, 01:05:07 PMQuote from: MRieck on August 27, 2009, 07:54:44 AM Yes...the larger the wheel the more accurate the timing. i wish they made a 12" dial indicator though... it's just as easy to be a degree or two off by misreading the indicator.dont worry, it just moves the powerband a few thousand revs up or down.... regarding the bearing, these old fairings need a bracket to connect the two top corners to somewhere fixed, otherwise the fairing twits like hell, it,s usually done with a braket that has a littl simple bearing in the midle and connects to the top steering stem nut. look at any of the new ducati paul smart replicas.
Quote from: MRieck on August 27, 2009, 07:54:44 AM Yes...the larger the wheel the more accurate the timing. i wish they made a 12" dial indicator though... it's just as easy to be a degree or two off by misreading the indicator.
Yes...the larger the wheel the more accurate the timing.
Gustafsson will make a screen for your Duc fairing:http://www.bikescreen.com/Great folks, a bit pricier than I recall... Used his screens on ram air GSXR 7/11's back in the late 80's.Your build is fantastic! Great attention to detail!Thanks again for the hook-up on 520 sprockets!Tom
though unable to access the article on frame design, here is a great tony foale link:http://www.lortim.demon.co.uk/reviews/Foale/index.htm
Quote from: paulages on August 22, 2009, 05:27:28 AMthough unable to access the article on frame design, here is a great tony foale link:http://www.lortim.demon.co.uk/reviews/Foale/index.htmThanks Paul, I'll read it and hope to understand. In the very least it will provide a basis for ongoing discussions on how to fix the handling of these bikes. I`ve tried progressive springs in the front forks and progressive shocks on the back 1 inch longer than stock. The bike (CB500) steers much quicker and suspension compliance is light years better than stock. It is still twitchy though.
Quote from: Kemp on September 02, 2009, 06:59:23 PMQuote from: paulages on August 22, 2009, 05:27:28 AMthough unable to access the article on frame design, here is a great tony foale link:http://www.lortim.demon.co.uk/reviews/Foale/index.htmThanks Paul, I'll read it and hope to understand. In the very least it will provide a basis for ongoing discussions on how to fix the handling of these bikes. I`ve tried progressive springs in the front forks and progressive shocks on the back 1 inch longer than stock. The bike (CB500) steers much quicker and suspension compliance is light years better than stock. It is still twitchy though. mine is a bit twitchy with 14" shocks on the rear, but it only really feels so at 100MPH or so. at slow speeds it handles much better than stock. i hope the steering damper solves this.
with more than a click or two on the damper you really start to feel how it slows down sterring response.
As to handling issues - what about the possibility of using a CB750 swingarm as a substitute for the CB550's. I've measured a few CB750's from various years and they measure about 18"-20" centre of swingarm to end/opening depending on the model. Some 750's are sort of welded square section 42x32mm(taper)approx while the CB550/500 is 35mm round and 20.5" long. Looks like you could adjust handling with a slightly shorter 750 arm and it might be stiffer as well? Again the issue might be that a shorter arm makes the bike more flickable but upsets the high speed stability.
Sweet baby jesus, that thing is purdier than I imagined it would be. I hope you've gone for a nice ride by now... and that it was worth the hell she put you through this summer. Looks like it probably was.
Sweet, bubbly, Buddha - Say it ain't so!!!
She's gorgeous!