Posted by: mlinder
Insert Quote
What Mike said.
The mid 70's BMW r90s is also a prime example. Came stock with a quarter fairing that acted like a sail in crosswinds, pulling the bike in whatever direction the wind was blowing.
Posted on: Today at 08:43:18 amPosted by: MRieck
Insert Quote
Quarter fairings can cause instability at high speeds. The Yamaha Seca 900 is an excellent exampe and that was with a factory developed fairing. My bike gets funky at about 105 or so.
Sooo, if I am not trying to set any speed records, I should be fine?? 
Seriously though, what about a windshield like what MCRider1 has posted? Would just the F-15 or F-16 style shield be considered a fairing?
I doubt very seriously I will ever be pushing over 80 (seeing as how 60 makes me nervous right now
) I installed slightly lower bars on my bike and I am trying to keep a sporty look, so 3/4 and full fairings don't seem like they would fit with the over all feel I am going for. At the same time, I definitely don't want to install something that is going to make it more unstable. Thanks again for everyones input!
Brandon
What everyone is saying here is true. A fairing mounted to the handlebars "presents" a barrier to side winds that your steering has to react to. A fairing mounted to the frame, while it still "presents' To the sidewind, has the weight of the bike behind it for stability.
The shield like the F15 while still mounted to the steering, presents very little to the sidewind. But it smoothes out the headwinds nicelty due to its design. And may actually add a little stability by loading the front suspension from the front, but not being affected (so much) from the side.
But its all trial and error, case by case. I have many windshields hanging on my wall in my shop. The F15 is the best I've ever tried. My FJR is fully faired, presents like a sail to sidewinds, but because of its frontal design and being a frame mount, is very stable.