Author Topic: Engine braking vs. Brakes  (Read 4283 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jonesy

  • Shop Rat
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,648
  • "Damn! These HM300 Pipes Are Expensive!!!"
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #25 on: October 26, 2005, 12:19:24 PM »
I've engine braked because the owner's manual (for my cb750 anyway) says it's perfectly OK to do so, as long as your engine doesn't make a foray into the red zone on the tach..
"Every time I start thinking the world is all bad, then I start seeing people out there having a good time on motorcycles; it makes me take another look." -Steve McQueen

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,493
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #26 on: October 26, 2005, 12:26:35 PM »
me 5.
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

Offline cb350f_rider_73

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 67
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #27 on: October 26, 2005, 01:04:36 PM »
Do you mean the maximum amount of brake needed to stop you in a reasonable distance, or do you mean a tire-howling, barely controlled stop at every stoplight?  To me 'maximum braking' means the latter, and I only use it when a car or deer threatens me with imminent destruction.  I do use the engine, front brake and rear brake for every stop so that it is an automatic action.  That has saved my bacon several times when an emergency stop was accomplished without having to figure out what to do while approaching an obsatcle.

Max amount needed to stop in a reasonable distance.  A tire-howling, skidding-every-way-but-loose stop is rather dangerous, and not good control at all.  Most of the time, you don't need all the braking the bike is capable of, so you can just sorta ease in for the stop.   :)

Wayne
1966 Honda CL77 Scrambler
1973 Honda CB350F (see avatar)
1979 Yamaha XS11 Special "The Beast"

Offline Gordon

  • Global Moderator
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,114
  • 750K1, 550K2
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #28 on: October 26, 2005, 01:18:04 PM »
I'm gonna agree with Bob on this one (anything's possible ;) ).  I generally downshift once I'm in the speed range for the next lower gear.  It slows the bike down some, but mainly it's just to keep it in the right gear for the speed I'm currently traveling.

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,493
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #29 on: October 26, 2005, 01:22:48 PM »
good god,the worlds goin to come to an end.
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

Offline mick750F

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,395
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #30 on: October 26, 2005, 01:47:13 PM »
   Add me to the both brakes + downshift gang. It's just a more balanced way to ride. It's important to be in the gear you need to be in if you have to accelerate quickly. As has already been mentioned the front brake has much more stopping power than the rear but the rear should be used also.

   Years ago a guy I rode with told me that he only used the rear brake. He was convinced that you didn't need the front. Something about hitting them too hard and flipping the bike. Nothing I could say would get him to change his way of thinking. It was that day that I decided to never be in front of him when riding. I don't ride with him anymore but I sometimes see him and wonder if he's figured it out yet. It has to be pretty hard stopping that Road King with just the rear brake. :D

Mike
'
Glosta, MA
It's not the heat...it's the humanity.

Offline cb350f_rider_73

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 67
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #31 on: October 26, 2005, 02:21:15 PM »
They make bikes nowadays with linked and integrated brakes just for folks like him, I guess.  Hit the rear brakes and you get all of 'em.   ;D

Wayne
1966 Honda CL77 Scrambler
1973 Honda CB350F (see avatar)
1979 Yamaha XS11 Special "The Beast"

Offline Bob Wessner

  • "Carbs Suck!"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,079
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #32 on: October 26, 2005, 03:23:57 PM »
Some even have ABS.  :o
We'll all be someone else's PO some day.

Offline Quail "Owner of the comfortable k8"

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 813
  • Now thats good eaten!!
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #33 on: October 27, 2005, 02:13:30 PM »
good god,the worlds goin to come to an end.

"Cats and dogs sleeping together!"
These wonderful little birds are great flyers, delicious eating, excellent for training your hunting dog, and just fun to shoot,or stuff and keep around the house.  Bobwhites can be put with other types of Quail and have very large penis's.  Quail are very popular with the babes.

Offline Quail "Owner of the comfortable k8"

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 813
  • Now thats good eaten!!
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #34 on: October 27, 2005, 02:18:07 PM »
Brakes are cheap, Clutches are not.

I will say it again.  Front brake pads 20.00 clutch pack and front pads 120.00.  Time to replace front pads 10 minutes.  Clutch pack and front pads 1hr 10min.

I down shift as the bike slows so that I am in the right gear, I just never let out the clutch.
These wonderful little birds are great flyers, delicious eating, excellent for training your hunting dog, and just fun to shoot,or stuff and keep around the house.  Bobwhites can be put with other types of Quail and have very large penis's.  Quail are very popular with the babes.

Buffo

  • Guest
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #35 on: October 27, 2005, 05:51:55 PM »
I am terrified of the rear brake. I almost never use it to stop the bike. I mainly use mine to keep the bike stopped once stopped at a light or where ever...

I dont really engine brake ether, I shift just to keep it in the proper gear...mainly I just use the front unless the poop hits the fan then I will use all three...I know how to use the rear...I am just more comfortable using the front...

Most people dont realize how well their brakes work so the tend to over brake and brake to often

...with cars, in the olden days you engine braked because brakes failed a lot so it was better to slow down with the tranny, but here in 2005 brakes are a bit better so for most applications engine braking is a personal preference not a nessesity...

Offline Quail "Owner of the comfortable k8"

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 813
  • Now thats good eaten!!
Re: Engine braking vs. Brakes
« Reply #36 on: October 27, 2005, 06:13:35 PM »
I use the front brake a lot more than the rear also.  Not in a corner or when on gravel of course but most of the time.  i can clamp it on and it will almost slid the wheel so I know I have 100% braking in the front.  I use the rear if i want to stop even faster.  Again front pads are cheap.  i am cheap.
These wonderful little birds are great flyers, delicious eating, excellent for training your hunting dog, and just fun to shoot,or stuff and keep around the house.  Bobwhites can be put with other types of Quail and have very large penis's.  Quail are very popular with the babes.