They have a right and an obligation to protect the brand...
( I'm not normally a Big company rights guy.... but I've seen this deal with Hot Rod Magazine quite a bit and frankly it's amazing the crap folks will put a logo on if they aren't checked... )
K
Yes the "obligation" part is what many misunderstand I think. If you have a trade or service mark, and you obviously don't protect it, you can lose it. That's the law. So Honda and everyone else with millions and billions invested in their brand, must, whether they want to or not, stop people from using the brand without permission. Has nothing to do with whether they need the money or that they want to pick on the little guy.
So the argument becomes "why pick on this one over that one?" Simply, with big brands there are so many potential offenders, Honda (or their lawyers) just throw some darts and whoever gets hit is who gets the clamps. Of course the blatant violaters get closer scrutiny.
Bottom line the companies must actively protect their brand and the evidence of this activity is to throw lawsuits at offenders.
I doubt the general public holds this against their reputation.