Neil, this bike looks nice and clean, but not necessarily all original.
s/n's are good for a K1. Mine is 1067xxx, 11/70 build, E1068xxx - so these two bikes are fairly close.
I have 8000 rpm redline, which is correct for K1 - the book is a little bit wrong.
K1's had cut front fender, front edge - the later models had a rolled front edge. I wrecked my cut fender and replaced it with a rolled edge fender (K2?). Your photo looks like the bike has a rolled edge fender.
I'm all wet on that one
K1 rolled fenderYour seat looks identical to mine, I replaced my original after the vinyl piping cracked. I think I have a K2 seat now- can't remember what I did 34 years ago. The later seat has the piping that curves down to follow the back of the riders leg.
Messed up here too
Seat looks good: DEFECTIVE MEMORYThe original pipes would be stamped with HM300, or not at all, and would not be stamped HM341. They would have a matte finish on the heat shield, and not chrome.
3 strikes and I'm out, chrome heat shields are correct My original pipes rusted out in about 3 years, and I replaced them with 341 pipes - looks are identical, but internals are not identical.
If you are paying big bucks for this bike you can ask for anything. I haven't ever done a compression test on my bike and it runs great. Look in the gas tank for rust. Open a float bowl and see how clean the carbs are. Has the front brake been rebuilt? Has the engine been apart? Has it thrown a drive chain through the engine case?
Is this to be your rider? Sunday rider? a show bike? added to your collection? an investment? If the dealer is reputable he knows the fair market price, and so should you before bribe your bride.
