Author Topic: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.  (Read 1902 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Alan F.

  • We remember the Night Rider, and we know who you are.
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,348
Re: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2022, 10:08:13 AM »
I found a great 754 quote along the way:

It's starting to look like you don't know how much to tighten stuff...
Wait a second, aren't you the guy that had things falling off?
 
I am starting to see a pattern here.......

Offline seanbarney41

  • not really that much younger than an
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,842
Re: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2022, 03:12:01 PM »
The A cam was designed to work with tiny carbs and intake ports.  The idea was to maximize intake velocity(as opposed to volume) for better low end torque at the expense of lots of top end power.  So yeah, you will probably would get a nice off the line feel but it won't rev to the moon like a good cb750 should.  You end up with sort of a mechanical "conflict of interests"...unless you intend your 750 to perform farm duties or tow some big cargo.
If it works good, it looks good...

Online Alan F.

  • We remember the Night Rider, and we know who you are.
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,348
Re: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.
« Reply #27 on: January 09, 2022, 07:48:41 PM »
(Smiling) Thanks Sean, I appreciate your explanation. It might be a fine cam to use if building a 750 engined piece of equipment, but probably not a bike then.
I'll file that away, never know when I'll need it.

Online Alan F.

  • We remember the Night Rider, and we know who you are.
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,348
Re: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.
« Reply #28 on: January 12, 2022, 02:12:00 PM »
Cam arrived today, I'll be measuring it soon.

Online Alan F.

  • We remember the Night Rider, and we know who you are.
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,348
Re: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.
« Reply #29 on: January 12, 2022, 03:35:39 PM »
Bearing surfaces:

Online Alan F.

  • We remember the Night Rider, and we know who you are.
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,348
Re: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.
« Reply #30 on: January 12, 2022, 04:09:32 PM »
First run thru with a dodgy Vernier:

Online Alan F.

  • We remember the Night Rider, and we know who you are.
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,348
Re: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.
« Reply #31 on: January 12, 2022, 04:14:15 PM »
Markings:

Online Alan F.

  • We remember the Night Rider, and we know who you are.
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,348
Re: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.
« Reply #32 on: January 12, 2022, 04:38:29 PM »
I was a little thrown by the order of the cam lobes intake and exhaust, I'd never considered it but design-wise it's one good way to make everything fit together in a confined space.

Offline Jerry Rxman Griffin aka MuthaF'er

  • This MuthaF'er is getting to be a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,915
  • Bought her new 4/75
Re: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.
« Reply #33 on: January 13, 2022, 07:20:56 AM »
I took these measurements on several stock cams including my original purchase Yoshimura Daytona cam and I swear the heights are identical with one exception - my original low serial number F exhaust lobe is 0.1mm taller than all others. I was very surprised. I only know for sure one came from a K8 engine and one came from my F0. The others??? Timing? Lobe centers? I did not measure them on the engine.
As of today 3/13/2012 my original owner 75 CB750F has made it through 3 wives, er EX-wives. Free at last.  ;-)

Offline HondaMan

  • Someone took this pic of me before I became a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,865
  • ...not my choice, I was nicknamed...
    • Getting 'em Back on the Road
Re: Found a 750K0 cam, opinions please.
« Reply #34 on: January 14, 2022, 03:05:49 PM »
I was a little thrown by the order of the cam lobes intake and exhaust, I'd never considered it but design-wise it's one good way to make everything fit together in a confined space.

Yeah, I always smile and shake my head when I see this page with its measurements from an ideal sandcast engine. When I was measuring lots and lots of these cams (in the 1970s) it was very rare to find one with an intake height of 1.411", as spec'd. Most of them were in the 1.398"-1.405" range, brand new or less than 1000 miles, for the intake lobes. The exhausts were usually close, though.

More important was/is the duration and overlap numbers. These are not so easy to measure: the simplest way without a fancy test rig is to use the engine itself, when assembled (and turn the alternator bolt, please, so you don't bend the spark advancer's shaft) and a degree wheel with a dial indicator on the rocker tip, set to 0.000" clearance. The F0 and later engines use a 0 degree BTDC intake opening (at 0.002" valve lash) while the early engines used 5 degrees BTDC. This became less by the K3, usually around 3 degrees.
See SOHC4shop@gmail.com for info about the gadgets I make for these bikes.

The demons are repulsed when a man does good. Use that.
Blood is thicker than water, but motor oil is thicker yet...so, don't mess with my SOHC4, or I might have to hurt you.
Hondaman's creed: "Bikers are family. Treat them accordingly."

Link to Hondaman Ignition: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=67543.0

Link to My CB750 Book: https://www.lulu.com/search?adult_audience_rating=00&page=1&pageSize=10&q=my+cb750+book

Link to website: www.SOHC4shop.com