I did suggest X-rings as a possible improvement but can't say from experience whether they really work better. Think of it as an experiment and not a proven fact. I did try harder durometer o-rings but they leaked too.
Why is it some engines never have a problem while others can never be sealed? I would like to find the differences,.. is it depth of counterbore, surface finish, different head gasket crush, warped head?
The X-rings seem like a good try but their benefits might be more for aplications that need to seal while rotating or sliding?
kayaker43. Well...You know if they DON'T work...ALL of us are coming to your house and moon you on your front lawn!!!

No really, I appreciate the idea. I didn't know that they even existed. They look like a much better way to go. I personally am going to take a chance and try them. Most all of us know how the O-rings work...NOT VERY WELL!
Buying my bike new, I had them retorque the head when they started to seep within the warranty period. It lasted for several years but I put it away 3 years ago when it really started to leak. And mind you, I ONLY have 9800 miles on my bike.
ONE thing I did have done was I had my head VERY fine cut surfaced. It came back looking like a mirror.
The SAE equivalent o-ring or x-ring cross section IS .0046" thicker. 2.5mm= .0984". 3/32= .103"