I think the best point in the article is about how "actual work" will help your other work - that the problem-solving skills that come from something like rebuilding a motorcycle engine are just as valuable as the "analytical skills" that come from, say, a PhD in political philosophy. Probably even more valuable.
When I finished college, one of my professors gave this long speech about how, in the same way that both archery and flower arranging are paths to Zen enlightenment (I know I'm getting that wrong, but forgive me), an education isn't so much about the destination (a degree in French) as it is about the journey. Getting a degree is about learning to learn, in a way. The article is right to point out that you can learn to learn just as well fixing an internal combustion engine as you can by studying Dante.
However, not a lot of people see it that way. My wife's boss is a total snob for degrees, and because of this the one guy at her job who knows how to do everything is ineligible for a full-time position. He has to beg and plead for a new contract every summer to get a terrible part-time deal with no benefits and bad hours. He keeps the place running, but because he didn't finish his math credit thirty years ago, he can't do the "actual work" that needs to be done and get appropriately compensated for it.
Obviously, the boss couldn't fix anything if his life depended on it, and so he surrounds himself with people just as incompetent at "actual work" as he is, so he's not intimidated. I think the way "actual work" is treated by a lot of people - as a "low" way to make a living - is because of these same feelings of intimidation. Maybe this economic downturn will change things, so that actually making something will be respected again, but I doubt it.
Something the article's author didn't say, of course, was that it's flipping hard to make a living fixing motorcycles. Especially when there's a place like this that helps people do it themselves.
