Face it, we are all of us having our privacy invaded by someone, somewhere, sometime and noise, motorcycle exhaust noise to be specific is a tiny tiny factor in the big picture.
...But,
this one is fairly easy to control. ...for the not too stodgy, and willing to live peacefully.
...I briefly owned, an unholy sound like nothing you ever heard from a bike close up and well over 110dB.
You should learn to read lips.
But really, you'd have certainly gotten a police visit at 1AM. At least, in my neighborhood anyway, (which is distinctly lower middle class). Perhaps there wouldn't be complaints in a ghetto. They wouldn't complain there about a single gunshot, either.
I like loud bikes, I like the multitude of different sounds they make, they are a pleasure in my life that I don't want to give up, ever. If you think that makes me antisocial, a "dick", un-neighbourly then that's your opinion and you're entitled to it, but your opinion is yours, it isn't mine, it means nothing to the multi-coloured aural tapestry of my world and it never will.
Wow, you sure told be off.
I like, and have liked, many of the things you listed in your post, too. (And I said so previously.) None of them have a place in a residential neighborhood, and you know it. If you insist on forcing it upon people willy-nilly, then you ARE a dick.
My comment was more about the attitude presented in your post, where you professed no regard for others in certain venues. I think the risk there is that once such a decision is made, it is fairly easy to expand the venues of allowance to fit the current mood.
You've hit the nail on the head TT - but we can actually contract the venues of allowance and let's make sure we stop pesky exhaust noise, rattly clutches, squeaking brakes, hell let's solve this once and for all and ban bikes completely! There, done...
The ban on motorcycles is already a reality in some places. Pebble beach 17 mile scenic drive, and many campgrounds about the country are a couple of examples.
Don't blame me, I didn't do it. It was the I'll-do-anything-I-want-crowd that ruined it for us all.
Thanks, for your contribution! There is currently discussion about banning motorcycles in National Parks. If the motorcycles don't quiet down, it will happen, as there are currently teams making measurements to quantify the reported noise problem. I'll be right pissed if the noisy exhaust crowd prevents me from biking through all national parks!
Yes I know that's a facetious response but my point is this.
I don't think it is facetious at all. The reality is forthcoming, get used to more restrictions.
In starting this thread with a bunch of out of context facts and figures
Wait. What is out of context?
That hearing loss occurs with exposure to loud noise?
That loud noise is harmful to individuals whether they ask for it willingly or not?
That your position, of insisting on bombarding random individuals with sound, is not intrusive (and unnecessarily so)?
What is out of context that waking/disturbing the neighbors is anti-social and "dick-like" behavior?
What makes your selfish "wants" outweigh the basic "needs" of the rest of humanity?
that serve only to justify your position in your mind, you've specified a point of personal choice and aimed to justify it as fact.
For one thing it is not just me. I'm mostly the reporter here, in response to an investigative request by Mike. And, I am quite certain it is you that are presenting a minority position.
Further, you can't dismiss the facts presented with a simple statement that they are.
If that
is the case, then I can simply state that you are wrong on every point you've made. There. done. (See, how that works?)
Equally those who like noise can post reams of out of context supporting evidence to the contrary...
Really? I haven't seen anything yet. Besides the, I-wanna-make-noise-cause-I-like-it rebuttal.
Motorcycle noise is all about free choice within the boundaries of our societal laws. You go over the boundary in your specific geography and you face the consequences if you get caught.
Agreed. However, the point is that the laws are usually written after the offense is recognized, defined, and quantified, IE, when enough belligerent bozos flagrantly taunt the populace with offensive behavior. Legislation has ALREADY been made in response to loud motorcycle noise, at least in the US. Personally, I don't see you can claim free choice in the UK as you have MOT. How free is that? How much did you pay for that? Was it free?
A thread like this seems to me to fail to recognise the one consistent thing in this kind of question - everyone has a free will and a choice of their own.
Yes, everyone has free will...until societal measures take that away. If you push or annoy enough of society, you can effect more than your own "free will" but the opportunities for many, with restrictive laws, enforcement actions, and bans for machine types.
If you are not allowed to have any machine or tool your "free will" desires dictate, then are you really free in the first place? Ooow, that's deep...
I hesitated to quote the age old comment on opinions but it does lend itself to this debate - "opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one and a fair proportion of them stink"
You were right to hesitate. Because in a non-dictatorial society, it is the number of opinions that define acceptable behavior and practice.
In case you wish to forward the concept that your position is equal to the masses rather than the small minority it really is, let's look at realities.
By the way it is that very small minority population that allows you your current level of "free will" to annoy others with your intrusive toys. If your "annoy others with noise" population grows, society will most definitely remove your "free will" after infraction of established guidelines.
Quote from Wiki:
"There are around 200 million motorcycles (including mopeds, motor scooters, motorized bicycles, and other powered two and three-wheelers) in use worldwide, or about 33 motorcycles per 1000 people. This compares to around 590 million cars, or about 91 per 1000 people."
Point: There are more of "them" than there are of "us". And, there are a lot of "us" that don't want your loud exhaust near our homes, either.
Restrictions are certainly happening here in the US. Enforcement can't be too far off. So, a big, sarcastic "thank you" for making the noise problem an issue to cause action that effects us all.
New York City Council Intro 416-AA proposed enforcement amendment to allow the New York City Police Department to visually inspect parked motorcycles for the required EPA stamp.
Denver City Council Amendment on Motorcycle NoiseIn 2007, the Denver City Council passed Bill 242 prohibiting motocycle owners from modifying the exhaust system to increase noise levels. All motorcycles are required to bear the EPA stamp for noise emissions on the exhaust system.
Boston City Council Regulating Motorcycle NoiseIn 2009, the Boston City Council passed Docket 0658, the ordinance grants the Boston Police Department the authority to fine any motorcycle that does not display the required EPA stamp on the exhaust system.
California SB 435In 2010, California passed SB 435. It requires motorcycle operators to maintain their federally required emissions equipment (on both original, and aftermarket exhaust systems), including a readily visible EPA stamp certifying compliance.
Hmmm, I wonder if I should present my data to the local city council...and urge them to enforce the 80db emissions law recently passed here in Cali.
It won't be too hard for other states to pattern laws known to be successful in other states. Think of the revenue it would produce! And perhaps, then the aftermarket suppliers would make replacement exhausts that weren't stupid loud (replacing the loud exhaust you bought from them last year). See? That's what makes the economy work!
Cheers,