Author Topic: CB350F: two failed top end rebuilds, stock bore and 393cc  (Read 32654 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #25 on: May 14, 2017, 08:52:00 PM »
Here's a photo of the rings I used. Absolutely sure they're one-piece




Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #26 on: May 14, 2017, 09:11:25 PM »
I just noticed in that photo that the second ring, the oil scraper, are in fact also labelled with a clear "TOP". So it's very unlikely I put them in upside down. Maybe it cracked, but I'm leaning toward a failed oil seal/head gasket given that it didn't smoke at all for the first 50km. I rode three times in the city without incident before taking it on the highway. On my ride yesterday, I stopped 50KM into the ride, no smoke. Then I arrived in town 50KM later and it was a smokefest. Something gave up in that final 50KM...

Leak down test this week. If it IS the oil supply line leaking into the cylinder, how would I confirm that with the leak down test? There wouldn't be any significant leakage out the valves or rings. If the leak down test pressure made its way into the oil supply line, I suppose I would hear it in the head as well as the crankcase, wouldn't I?

Offline Ridem32

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 292
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #27 on: May 14, 2017, 10:34:51 PM »
I'm not even sure with a leak down test or compression tester if anything would show up. With the compression rings being new it can still show and hold compression even with a broken oil ring.  But I would run both test just to see the results. I did look at the factory rings and it does show one ring for oil ring. Aftermarket rings use the 3 oil rings like most all oil rings use.  Even if it's a broken oil ring it's not the end of the world it can be replaced.  I think the oil ring on #4 broke after you rode it.  I don't think it's nothing that you did wrong putting it together or breaking it in while riding it.  Run test and let us know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline calj737

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,100
  • I refuse...
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #28 on: May 15, 2017, 03:27:45 AM »
Cal - the engine smokes all the time, even at idle. It just smokes the worst after engine braking and then rolling on. But there is definitely a steady stream of blue smoke coming out the pipe.
Sorry, I misunderstood earlier what you wrote. Constant smoking is going to be in the cylinder, not the head, whatever the cause.
'74 550 Build http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=126401.0
'73 500 Build http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=132935.0

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of it's victim may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #29 on: May 16, 2017, 06:15:42 PM »
Ok, some more info to share.

I haven't been able to source a leak down tester yet, but I'll just make one if I can't find or borrow something this week. I was able to do a compression test though.

1-2-3-4





Man. Can't get much more consistent than that. All four within 1 psi of each other.

Last year before the rebuild my results were
1: 125
2: 105. 115 max after a few more hits. 180 wet
3: 120
4: 125

Kinda weird that the numbers are actually a touch lower. But they're much more consistent.

 I also pulled the plugs after my 110km ride home on the highway.



It looks to me like 1 is lean, 2/3 are close, and of course 4 is fouled. I've also been getting some black smoke on top of blue. Perhaps 4 is getting way to much fuel from a stuck float or something.

I'm going to pull the carbs so I can look into the head at the valve guides, see if there is any sign of oil running past. While I'm there I'll check the float heights and jets.

Not really any closer to diagnosing the problem. Hopefully a leak down test sheds more light before i have to open it up


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: May 17, 2017, 07:36:35 AM by markreimer »

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #30 on: May 16, 2017, 06:37:43 PM »
Here's a photo looking inside the intake of #4. Hard to say if it looks normal or not. Thoughts?





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #31 on: May 16, 2017, 06:39:14 PM »
Compared to 1/2/3






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #32 on: May 16, 2017, 07:29:07 PM »
Pulled the carbs, they are immaculate. No dirt or blockages anywhere. Floats were all at exactly 22mm. Quickly ticking off the 'easy' checks before the head comes off.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Ridem32

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 292
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #33 on: May 16, 2017, 08:27:25 PM »
I sure wish you the best of luck. But I still say broken oil ring on #4.  I hope I'm wrong


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #34 on: May 16, 2017, 09:16:45 PM »
Managed to make a leak down tester (without a dual gauge) with stuff I had laying around.

I couldn't detect air leaking anywhere even at 80psi. If I increase pressure the engine would turn over. Without second hands that's the best I could do.

So good compression, no obvious leaks. Nothing left to do here but pull the head and check for a blown gasket by the oil seal, and possibly broken rings.

Either way I need new gaskets so I'll order those up now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: May 17, 2017, 07:38:23 AM by markreimer »

Offline Ridem32

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 292
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #35 on: May 16, 2017, 09:41:11 PM »
Keep us informed.  Everything will work out. The worst part of any job is dreading it. Just take your time and do it.  It's really not that bad to pull head and jugs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #36 on: May 17, 2017, 07:41:23 AM »
Will do. I know it's a fairly easy affair to pull it apart on a 350F, more-so a pain given the time off the road and the cash. But it must be done.

What do you guys think about how that intake valve guide looks: it appears to me that there is a very light spray of oil in there. But there was no oil pooled on the top of the valve or evidence of oil running down out of the guide that I could see. I'm thinking given how oily that cylinder is, it probably got a bit oily in there when the intake valve opened up. Does that make sense, given that air would be rushing into the cylinder at that moment?



Currently trying to source an OEM gasket set. It was really hard to find some the first time I rebuilt the top end. I might have to go aftermarket  :-[

I hear nothing but bad things about NE gaskets. Versah doesn't appear to have made a 350F kit. Any luck with Athena gaskets on this engine?
« Last Edit: May 17, 2017, 08:26:30 AM by markreimer »

Offline Ridem32

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 292
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #37 on: May 17, 2017, 08:59:15 AM »
Check with David silver spares.com


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #38 on: May 17, 2017, 09:04:14 AM »
I did, no luck. There are three on eBay now. Two come in complete gasket kits for around $250 Canadian (I'm Canadian). That's what I originally bought last year, but it was only around $100 then...

There is one head gasket on its own for $80 Canadian, which I'll probably jump on. That's the most important item. The four oil seals I can order from Honda directly. The base gasket and valve cover o-ring style gasket are available for pretty cheap. I might just have to cobble this all together.

There is also a copper head gasket on eBay. Curious about that. I like the whole resuable aspect, but I know nothing of this seller/manufacturer...

http://www.ebay.ca/itm/161756230924?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

On second though, this says 52mm gasket. 350F pistons are only 47 or so. I wonder if this is meant for a 400F and is mislabelled.

Offline cphill02

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #39 on: July 25, 2017, 02:05:23 PM »
Any update on what the root cause was?

Offline RAFster122s

  • I feel like a really really
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,504
  • SOHC4 member # 2605
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #40 on: July 25, 2017, 10:33:21 PM »
Copper head gaskets will leak oil, typically only used by race bikes or those who do not mind cleaning oil off the motor regularly.  I would steer clear of a copper head gasket unless you are racing and tearing down the motor often.
David- back in the desert SW!

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #41 on: August 08, 2017, 12:03:22 PM »
Brought the bike back into the garage finally. Job changes and life etc prevented me from getting back into this motor. Now I've got some time free. I'll report back Thursday night, that's when I'm cracking it open again

Offline RAFster122s

  • I feel like a really really
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,504
  • SOHC4 member # 2605
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #42 on: August 08, 2017, 01:41:56 PM »
Mark,  I think you may misunderstand what a leakdown tester is...or is not.  A leakdown tester is looking to see if a pressurized cylinder leaks "down" from an initial pressurized setting.  It is not a continuously fed cylinder by a compressor to maintain a certain pressure.
You pressurize a cylinder to 80-100-120 psi , then you remove the pressure source.  The gauge holds that pressure and the gauge show you the current pressure in that cylinder...this is done at TDC on compression stroke.  Then you will compare the pressure after a 3-5 minute or longer interval.  You do this test and compare it to other cylinders.  Typically it has a shot of oil in the cylinders to give it a better reading/chance to show a more real life reading.

If you are not able to hold pressure in a cylinder without significant leaking then you have a valve or ring or headgasket issue.

Comparing other cylinders gives you a basis to judge overall engine health and comparatively between cylinders.

Ensuring your valves are properly set is a good idea before this or wet and dry compression checks.



Managed to make a leak down tester (without a dual gauge) with stuff I had laying around.

I couldn't detect air leaking anywhere even at 80psi. If I increase pressure the engine would turn over. Without second hands that's the best I could do.

So good compression, no obvious leaks. Nothing left to do here but pull the head and check for a blown gasket by the oil seal, and possibly broken rings.

Either way I need new gaskets so I'll order those up now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
David- back in the desert SW!

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #43 on: August 08, 2017, 02:03:59 PM »
I see. I didn't hold it there for 5 minutes, rather I pressurized the cylinder, and listed for air escaping either through the exhaust valve, intake valve, or into the engine case (past the rings). I couldn't hear air hissing anywhere. I had just had new valve seats cut and lapped, with a cylinder hone and new rings, so I didn't expect to hear anything.

Either way, top end comes apart Thursday and it'll be clear as day if I have a broken ring or blown gasket.

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #44 on: August 10, 2017, 10:36:58 PM »
Well I got the engine apart and found some very weird surprises.

First surprise - there were no broken piston rings and no sign of a blown head gasket. Hmm, interesting...


Second surprise. Those OEM oil orifice seals appeared to have disintegrated. It's not clear if that happened during disassembly, but the rubber was pooched. These came in a NOS Honda OEM gasket kit. I had a light layer of hondabond around the seals, and Copper Coat on the head gasket. I'm not sure if they fell apart from age, heat, reaction to the copper, who knows. Maybe I sprayed brake cleaner down there or something and don't remember. Either way, they were fried, but there was no sign of oil leaking past the head gasket.



Third surprise - All four of the pistons tops and valve faces seemed equally sooty and nasty, after only about 100 miles. Though plugs 2/3/4 weren't the worst compared the #1



Fourth surprise, and this is the BIG one. I went to check that I put the rings in #1 in correctly, as that is the cylinder that seemed to burn a boat load of oil. I couldn't find the "top" marking, though I could on the other 3, so I decided to remove the ring for a close look. It does seem that I had it in correctly, but I decided to check the ring end gap. My service manual says the range is 0.1 - 0.3mm, with an absolute max of 0.7. I was somewhere around three times that!! I had a .5, .55 and .6 stacked together and it still fit. WTF.



I never filed these rings. They are NOS OEM Honda. What is weird is that I remember clearly measuring the ring gap and have in my notes that they were close, but still under the max range. So what on earth happened... Maybe I measured it wrong. Or is there some possible way they could have worn that badly so fast? I wouldn't think so...

So I removed a ring from #4 to compare. It was better, but still measured at 0.7, the max limit.

Cylinders look good. Pistons feel snug in the bore.

What next? I'm thinking I could spring for new rings, but what if they are just as loose? Then I'm out $100 for rings. Maybe I just buy the Cruizin Image 393 and bore out the block, then I know everything is good.

Thoughts??




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: August 10, 2017, 10:58:31 PM by markreimer »

Offline Keith

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 360
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #45 on: August 11, 2017, 02:39:03 AM »
It is possible that the valve guide seal popped off the guide, vacuum will draw oil through the guide. Leak down won't find that.

Offline calj737

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,100
  • I refuse...
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #46 on: August 11, 2017, 04:02:05 AM »
Before I spent the money on rings or pistons, I'd check the bores very carefully with a micrometer. If for some reason that bore is much larger, the ring will only close to its tension point. It would also explain the excessive amount of oil being brought up and past fouling the domes and valve seats.

I haven't looked back through the thread to review what you did/didn't do to the original bores before the rebuild.
'74 550 Build http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=126401.0
'73 500 Build http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=132935.0

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of it's victim may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #47 on: August 11, 2017, 06:07:20 AM »
I had my machine shop measure the bore and pistons before they did the hone. They told me there was enough meat there to stay within the piston-to-bore spec in my manual, though 'just' enough. I measured it myself as well and my measurements agreed with them. The piston feels quite tight in there. I'll check again with a micrometer, but I can't imagine it's expanded that much. I mean, I have in my notes that the ring gap was within spec, which is .1-.3mm, wear limit of .7mm. #1 cylinder is around 1.5mm now. That's a huge amount of cylinder to wear away! I can still see the hone cross hatching, and like I said, piston feels very snug and good in there. I had no rattling piston sounds while it ran, and the pistons look good.

Would very large ring gaps alone explain my oil consumption problem, even if the piston to bore clearance is within spec?

Offline markreimer

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,192
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #48 on: August 11, 2017, 06:08:46 AM »
Hi Keith - I checked the seals, they're all where they're supposed to be. See my big post just before this one, I found massive ring gaps on all my cylinders. No broken rings or missing valve seals. My oil supply seals were in bad shape, but no sign of oil creeping past the head gasket anywhere.

Offline innovativems

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,029
    • Innovative MotoSports
Re: 350F break-in error? Lots of smoke suddenly
« Reply #49 on: August 11, 2017, 06:14:20 AM »
I had my machine shop measure the bore and pistons before they did the hone. They told me there was enough meat there to stay within the piston-to-bore spec in my manual, though 'just' enough. I measured it myself as well and my measurements agreed with them. The piston feels quite tight in there. I'll check again with a micrometer, but I can't imagine it's expanded that much. I mean, I have in my notes that the ring gap was within spec, which is .1-.3mm, wear limit of .7mm. #1 cylinder is around 1.5mm now. That's a huge amount of cylinder to wear away! I can still see the hone cross hatching, and like I said, piston feels very snug and good in there. I had no rattling piston sounds while it ran, and the pistons look good.

Would very large ring gaps alone explain my oil consumption problem, even if the piston to bore clearance is within spec?

Absolutely on a larger ring gap


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2007 KTM 990 adv
2003 Honda RC51
2000 Yamaha YSR50
1978 Honda Express
1975 Honda CB400f
1974 Honda CB350f
1974 Kawi H2
1974 Honda CB550f
1971 Kawi h1
1973 Kawi h1
1974 gt 550
1974 gt550