I doubt we have one of those. At least not someone with access to all the testing equipment required to conclusively answer the question.
Someone with the funding and research equipment would be the manufacturers and the oil producers, who would rather sell on the basis of a marketing program geared to feeding human emotions rather than logical deductive reasoning, as the emotions predominantly control purchase decisions , especially when qualitative and quantified data is withheld.
Anyway, we used to have some posters in the oil business. And, some competent researchers. I think they were all chased away by ranting personal attacks. And a number of people who are so vehemently "brand loyal" (Its' worked for 40 years) position. It's why "oil threads" are so contentious. A solitary voice of reason is simply shouted down by a vocal faction, fueled by marketing hyperbole.
If you search this forum, you might find these past posts. The info will be dated, of course, what with the constantly changing auto industry formulations, which, IMO plays into the hands of the planned obsolescence viewpoint.
It does make me wonder how much longer I can rely on the "Honda oil for Honda machines" philosophy.
Cheers,