Author Topic: why SOHC over DOHC?  (Read 11191 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stev-o

  • Ain't no
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 34,452
  • Central Texas
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #25 on: September 06, 2012, 09:20:07 PM »
If I was in the market for a 450, I would buy Jag's.  A little more than $500...
'74 "Big Bang" Honda 750K [836].....'76 Honda 550F.....K3 Park Racer!......and a Bomber!............plus plus plus.........

Offline lucky

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,715
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #26 on: September 06, 2012, 09:38:50 PM »
The 400F was glass smooth compared to the CB350 twins.

I know because I drove CB350 twins from Tucson to San Francisco and back at least 3 times.

I bought one of the first 400 fours. Unbelievably smooth.

The 350 F was a fluke, Honda got the gearbox right and the styling right on he 400F . It really was the first cafe bike.

I also drove THE first CB450 delivered to Tucson, Ariz. It was big and fast but
it did have some vibration like the other twins.


Offline jason41987

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 520
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #27 on: September 06, 2012, 10:02:48 PM »
oh, i dont make permanent modifications to anything anyway.. i restore to essentially stock condition and only change bolt on components.. like the seat foam/upholstry, mufflers, grips... and whenever i do modify something i store the original parts in a way where their condition wont degrade and they can be sold with the bike should i ever sell it and the buyer wants it stock

i wouldnt mind an SOHC/4, perhaps smaller than the 750 though... 400Fs seem to be rarer than the other ones so id definitely keep my options open to a 550 if one came around to me
« Last Edit: September 06, 2012, 10:04:34 PM by jason41987 »

Offline jason41987

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 520
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #28 on: September 07, 2012, 01:06:14 AM »
is it just me.. or do the twins seem to have more of a slimmer, agile, and aggressive stance to them vs fours?... it just seems theyre leaner and more aggressive looking in cafe racer form vs a four in the same form

Offline Teatimetim

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #29 on: September 07, 2012, 04:35:33 AM »
Yes they are slimer, and they handle a bit different, my cb450 is much lighter then my 550.   It also has a deeper sound..  But if I where buying a project bike a 350f or a 400f would be my preference outside of a 750.
Bikes I own:

1974 CB550K
1971 CB450

Offline Stev-o

  • Ain't no
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 34,452
  • Central Texas
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #30 on: September 07, 2012, 05:02:06 AM »
'74 "Big Bang" Honda 750K [836].....'76 Honda 550F.....K3 Park Racer!......and a Bomber!............plus plus plus.........

Offline tortelvis

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 537
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #31 on: September 07, 2012, 06:41:23 AM »
the cb 450 had rocker arms huh?
If so I would love to know where on the fIche that they are. I see cam followers but no rocker arms. I am on my third 450 now.

Offline MCRider

  • Such is the life of a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,376
  • Today's Lesson: One good turn deserves another.
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #32 on: September 07, 2012, 06:49:18 AM »
the cb 450 had rocker arms huh?
Yes it did, surprisingly. It pivoted on one end, the cam pushed on a hardened pad in the middle and the other end pushed on the valve. The pivot end had the eliptical adjuster as the pivot pin. You loosen a locknut and turn the adjuster which is actually the rocker pin, and that changes the clearance between the cam and the rocker pad. Hence, no shims.
Ride Safe:
Ron
1988 NT650 HawkGT;  1978 CB400 Hawk;  1975 CB750F -Free Bird; 1968 CB77 Super Hawk -Ticker;  Phaedrus 1972 CB750K2- Build Thread
"Sometimes the light's all shining on me, other times I can barely see, lately it appears to me, what a long, strange trip its been."

Offline MCRider

  • Such is the life of a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,376
  • Today's Lesson: One good turn deserves another.
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #33 on: September 07, 2012, 06:51:34 AM »
the cb 450 had rocker arms huh?
If so I would love to know where on the fIche that they are. I see cam followers but no rocker arms. I am on my third 450 now.
follower = rocker arm. Rather than a lever that pivots in the middle, its a "class 2" lever that pivots at the end, like a wheelbarrow. Nevertheless, i think rocker arm is a fair description. In the vernacular. That's what we always called them in the shops i was in.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2012, 06:54:59 AM by MCRider »
Ride Safe:
Ron
1988 NT650 HawkGT;  1978 CB400 Hawk;  1975 CB750F -Free Bird; 1968 CB77 Super Hawk -Ticker;  Phaedrus 1972 CB750K2- Build Thread
"Sometimes the light's all shining on me, other times I can barely see, lately it appears to me, what a long, strange trip its been."

Offline FunJimmy

  • Who you calling
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,798
  • Vancouver
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #34 on: September 07, 2012, 07:13:09 AM »
#1 reason to select a SOHC vs DOHC is this forum and it's members!
Have you met the DOHC crowd? HELLO!

 ;D
You never see a motorcycle parked outside of a psychiatrist's office!

CB550 Cafe Interceptor a Gentlemans Roadster
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=27159.0

Offline speedy gonzalais

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 417
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #35 on: September 07, 2012, 07:22:38 AM »
twin cam/ single cam whats it matter? twin cams some times performed better than the single back then but if its performance your after why not just buy a modern bike. I prefer the twin over the fours only cus they have more torque and pull a lot harder then I usually find myself off road so I need it, before buying any bike you should be intitled to a to a test ride, veiw a few, test them, decide what one you prefer.
82' C90
87' yamaha T80
79' CB125T/CD200 project
82' CB650z
80s kawasaki ae50/150cc project
92' Suzuki GSXR600
80' CB250N

Offline jaguar

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,778
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #36 on: September 07, 2012, 07:43:13 AM »
Why are you shopping with the prescribed $500 limit?  Searching for bikes based on price leads to alot of issues.  A $1500 bike that just pasted a state inspection is much cheaper then a $500 bike that has been sitting.  When I read "needs carbs and tires" I assume the seller just dragged it out of what ever barn it was in for the last 30 years and got it to "pop" on starter fluid.  Real trap for the inexperienced

Another thing, a "cafe conversion" is way more then a seat and a set of bars....well at least to some anyway. 

All bikes have pros and cons, its how it works.

Just for fun...
Mine


Offline Killer Canary

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,805
  • Typical Bran Muffin
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #37 on: September 07, 2012, 07:54:53 AM »
That's truly a thing of beauty!
If it's worth doing at all it's worth over-doing.
Honda MT250, CB400F, CB450K, CB550, GL500, CBR929
Kawi GPz900, H1

Offline Lil Red

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 98
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #38 on: September 07, 2012, 07:57:10 AM »
the cb 450 had rocker arms huh?
Yes it did, surprisingly. It pivoted on one end, the cam pushed on a hardened pad in the middle and the other end pushed on the valve. The pivot end had the eliptical adjuster as the pivot pin. You loosen a locknut and turn the adjuster which is actually the rocker pin, and that changes the clearance between the cam and the rocker pad. Hence, no shims.

Desmosudokurruhruh...

Offline jaguar

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,778
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #39 on: September 07, 2012, 08:25:19 AM »
That's truly a thing of beauty!

Thanks very much

Could be yours you know...lol
Im looking for a new home for her

Offline jason41987

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 520
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #40 on: September 07, 2012, 09:24:14 AM »
wht $500 and a lot of issues? because im looking for a winter project to work on this fall and winter.. something to do, a hobby thatll end with me having a really nice bike restored to nearly brand new condition.... if i can find a CB400F/550 id certainly go with that after listening to the way these engines sound.. but the CB450 cant be ignored either as its also a great bike

Offline Fritz

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 521
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #41 on: September 07, 2012, 09:45:48 AM »
Yes, a CB450k would be the next bike I'd buy if I ever could get a nice offer over here.
My brother had one back in the ealy 90s.
Unfortunately, the carb vacuum pistons where shot and he neither got it running decently nor did he find replacement. They seem to be hard to come by.

1976 CB550F

Offline phil71

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,813
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #42 on: September 08, 2012, 10:19:42 AM »
I just finished a resto on a k0 450 (i know, it's not only DOHC, but not a four.. we're off course.. )
It was the first ever vehicle to implement CV carbs, and they are terrible, but otherwise.. it's about as beautiful a thing as honda's ever built. And MC... for the sake of not confusing people, cam followers aren't really rocker arms per-se.
   Someone popping the valve covers off a cb450 for the first time might be surprised at what they see.
Yes, as someone pointed out, it's a bit of a nod (or theft) to the early desmodromic valvetrain ducati developed..
The cam was responsible not only for opening the valve, but when it swings back around, it also pulls the valve up, kind of like opening and closing a door in one fluid motion.

Offline faux fiddy

  • Just becaus I'm the second post on the pissed off thread doesn't mean I'm an
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,810
  • bike in a box
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #43 on: September 08, 2012, 10:47:18 AM »
i found a CB450 60 miles from me... ill call the guy tomorrow and see if he can email me some photos of it... $500 and apparently it runs, just needs a carb rebuild and some new tires... if it is as advertised, all be going with that one and pick it up this weekend, start working on it next week

That's prolly the one you want. The 450 is pretty much what won Daytona back in the day. I never realized they called it a CR though. Google Bob Hansen  or Team Hansen and you'll find plenty.

http://www.teamhansenhonda.com/

« Last Edit: September 08, 2012, 10:49:06 AM by fiddy of industry »
^^^^^^^/l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^/l^^^
. . ______/ l_________________/  l
<'  '  '   '  o .  . . . . . . .................(
 ' VVVVV'   ')))))____>-''''''''''''''''''\  l
' . vvvv_   -              -                 \/

Offline strynboen

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,884
    • http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?PHPSESSID=ml0bt6ihij4rcrb989qrk5i8k6&/topic,60973.0.html
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #44 on: September 08, 2012, 11:14:23 AM »
i just have bayed a cb 500 t...that valve torision spring and dobbel cam..are just ..hnmmm say..different than other engines..but great old engine..om a newer frame..and with disc brakes...old and new..on same bike..      the new bomber ;)
are the carbs the same as 450 bomber
« Last Edit: September 08, 2012, 11:22:07 AM by strynboen »
i kan not speak english/but trying!!
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=60973.0
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=144758.0
i hate all this v-w.... vords

Offline LesterPiglet

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,045
  • 1977 CB550F2
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #45 on: September 08, 2012, 11:23:25 AM »
i just have bayed a cb 500 t...that valve torision spring and dobbel cam..are just ..hnmmm say..different than other engines..but great old engine..om a newer frame..and with disc brakes...old and new..on same bike..      the new bomber ;)
are the carbs the same as 450 bomber
So it's you who buys them.  ;D Sorry but I think Honda messed up with the 500T.
'Then' and 'than' are completely different words and have completely different meanings. Same with 'of' and 'have'. Set and sit. There, their and they're. Draw and drawer. Could care less/couldn't care less. Bought/brought FFS.


Les Ross.            Certified by a Professional

Offline strynboen

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,884
    • http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?PHPSESSID=ml0bt6ihij4rcrb989qrk5i8k6&/topic,60973.0.html
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #46 on: September 08, 2012, 11:26:50 AM »
 :)ha yes it are the black cheep in honda family...but hope all others are  throv aut..then my one vill be the last..and i have somthing no other have
i kan not speak english/but trying!!
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=60973.0
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=144758.0
i hate all this v-w.... vords

Offline Magilla

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 764
  • My bike: 1976 CB750F
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #47 on: September 08, 2012, 11:40:33 AM »
Well you had posted that while I was typing my post.  There are people who take a nice survivor and cut it up and it always pains me.  The typical line here is "it's your motorcycle do what you want but...."   I'm a stocker, I like how honda made 'em.

I love them stock and I love them modified BUT here is my take on it.  If its a clean, mostly original bike or car, bring it back to stock.  If its already been modified or is rough, then do what ever you want to it.
1972   Honda CB350
1972   Yamaha 500
1982   Yamaha 650
1988   Harley Sportster 883
1983   HD FXR Shovelhead
2003   HD Heritage Softail
2006   Victory Vegas Jackpot
1980   Honda CB650
1976   Honda CB750K
1982   Honda CB750
1964   Honda CA95
1982   Kawasaki 550
1974   Honda CL360
1975   Suzuki GT550
1981   Honda CB750
1981   Honda CB750
1970   Norton Commando
1972   Yamaha U7E
1970   BMW R50/5
1976   Honda CB750F

Offline HondanutRider

  • Ride often - ride long - ride SAFE...and be an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,283
Re: why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #48 on: September 08, 2012, 12:05:13 PM »
I just finished a resto on a k0 450 (i know, it's not only DOHC, but not a four.. we're off course.. )
It was the first ever vehicle to implement CV carbs, and they are terrible, but otherwise.. it's about as beautiful a thing as honda's ever built. And MC... for the sake of not confusing people, cam followers aren't really rocker arms per-se.
   Someone popping the valve covers off a cb450 for the first time might be surprised at what they see.
Yes, as someone pointed out, it's a bit of a nod (or theft) to the early desmodromic valvetrain ducati developed..
The cam was responsible not only for opening the valve, but when it swings back around, it also pulls the valve up, kind of like opening and closing a door in one fluid motion.

Phil, I've never popped the head on a 450 (or the later 500 version of the same) - in fact I've only ridden one once and that was long ago in the 60's.  However, if my limited knowledge serves me correctly, the DOHC 450 design did NOT have a desmodronic valve action.  That action refers to a mechanism that closes the valves using a cam motion to lever it shut (which is what you incorrectly seem to describe on the Honda 450).  The Honda 450 had torsion bars to close the valves instead of coil springs - the cam was not used for closing, only opening the valves.  Ducati does use a true desmodronic valve mechanism in their motors.

Offline TwoBigCats

  • Hobbyist beekeeper
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 239
    • TwoBigCats
why SOHC over DOHC?
« Reply #49 on: September 08, 2012, 07:59:51 PM »
I just finished a resto on a k0 450 (i know, it's not only DOHC, but not a four.. we're off course.. )
It was the first ever vehicle to implement CV carbs, and they are terrible, but otherwise.. it's about as beautiful a thing as honda's ever built. And MC... for the sake of not confusing people, cam followers aren't really rocker arms per-se.
   Someone popping the valve covers off a cb450 for the first time might be surprised at what they see.
Yes, as someone pointed out, it's a bit of a nod (or theft) to the early desmodromic valvetrain ducati developed..
The cam was responsible not only for opening the valve, but when it swings back around, it also pulls the valve up, kind of like opening and closing a door in one fluid motion.
nice 450, phil.
GL1800 | 750 K6 | '69 CB/CL 160 | '70 CT 70