Hey Cal, even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut...
Sorry that my guess turned out to be true. Could the aperture be enlarged?
Or fitted with a glass cover over the end mounted into a two piece cap? Or just give it a small lip and O-Ring with the glass bezel between cap and cylinder body?
I know, I'm quick to create more work for you...
lest you forget I am a bastage rat or was that rat bastage...
Could it be that the housing is providing a slight bit of compression on the Mlock causing a circuit or component to bridge open...that is, defective unit.
Will it work if you just operate it with the cap off? That could isolate it.
From what I learned in electronics years ago, the RF shouldn't be emanating from the sides, while the wave form may have reflection from the body it shouldn't have a negative affect but if the wave form is two points radiating outward, the frequency and therefore the timing of the signal could be just perfect to have one signal be reflected 180 degrees out of phase with the other reflected signal and thereby serve to nearly zero the signal. Pretty farfetched swag grasping at the theory of the housing hosing your signal from the lock.
If it doesn't work with the cap off, will it work with the cap off and the lock pulled 1/4 of the way out of the housing? How about 1/2 way? or 3/4 of the way?
If the housing is causing reflections, then without the cap to do something, and if the sides were causing it, then that test I just described could point to that or some variant of something like that.
Hope this gets figured out without a lot of work. Maybe shipping the lock and housing back to you you could test it with your lock? And it could be tested with a replacement lock to ensure it wasn't going to have the same issue...
So, How about a phenolic tube or a fiberglass tube with some Kevlar? (NO CARBON FIBER, it definitely causes electronic and radio frequency issues)
Kevlar would make the tube become very resistant to cutting to access or defeat. Naturally just cutting the wires would be more logical if the mlock can be defeated by a simple hotwire...or does the MUnit have the intelligence to defeat the ignition if the mlock is tampered with after being programmed with it.
I've already got an email into MotoGadget, plus a few other electronics experts. I can't believe there's signal interference caused by a cap, especially with the aperture.
Chris, post some better pictures of the sensor installed. I can't seem to locate them in your thread?
It's all Davids fault for jinxing us with the idea. That rat bastage!
