Author Topic: goldwing vs. airhead beemer  (Read 4609 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Blaize

  • Relax, God is make believe.
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 180
goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« on: July 14, 2007, 10:55:46 PM »
So, I have a cb750 cafe racer, with an airtech solo seat and my wife and kid are really starting to pester me about taking them for rides. When I bought the thing it had a full windjammer and massive seat and of course at the time nobody trusted it enough to get on it with me (I paid $400 for it). Now that it is rebuilt of course everyone wants a ride.

 Anyway I am thinking of getting another bike for longer hauls with a passenger. I can only stand the clubmans for an hour or so, so it is totally a city bike, solo seat notwithstanding. I mentioned this to her a couple of months ago to let it percilate and lo and behold she gives me a "touring europe by motorcycle" book a couple of days ago. (We are moving to england in amonth and a half, and the 750 is going with us) So Hurrah !!! That is a green light to start thinking of what to get next!!

 Now a few years back in New Orleans I used to own a BMW R75/6 and while it had its issues, I was poor and patching things up rather than "fixing" things. When it did run well it was a very nice bike to be on. And of course R series airheads are well known to be good touring bikes. And they have the "cool older bike" pinach that I absolutely require. So I am looking at them.

 But, and there is always a but, I have also always liked the look of the very early Goldwings. The non faired models, first couple of years of production. And of course they are a good deal cheaper than a BMW. So my question (finally!!) is, who knows what about them? Are they reliable in the same way the cb750 is? Wich is really more "its reliable considering its age" I suppose, but still. Are ther good and bad years? Is it a wiring nightmare under the pretend gas tank? Or, are they solid, reliable, and comfortable bikes?

 Good points? bad points? Am I off my rocker?

 And before you say it, I know another cb750 in standard trim would be a good choice as well, but if I get to own more than one bike, I would rather have different models.

 So any input would be great, I know a few of you must have owned one of these at some point, and I bet a few still do.

 Thanks
Living the American dream (in England).

Offline medic09

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,666
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2007, 11:07:48 PM »
Well, just to complicate things; you might want to see if you can pick up in England a later (last year was '02 I think) Triumph Trophy.  Folks I've spoken too really like touring on them.  I like my Sprint ST, but the Trophy is a little more of a tourer from what I can tell.
Mordechai

'78 CB750K
'76 Triumph T160 Trident (rebuilding)
'07 aprilia Caponord

Santa Fe, NM

Offline Uncle Ernie

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,613
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2007, 05:24:03 AM »
Tough choice there.  Both similar, both so different. 
They're both about the same as far as "dependability" goes and by now that factor depends much more on how the individual bike was kept up.
The BMW will be (can't believe I'm saying this) a little lighter.  The Honda a little smoother -but they're both smooth really. 
Check a Gold Wing club about parts availability.  Otherwise, it's all you.  I know which one I'd pick...
Dude- your 8 layers are showing!

eldar

  • Guest
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2007, 09:13:29 AM »
another thing is that the gw parts might be easier to find and maybe cheaper. I dont know for sure but that is what you will really want to look at.

Offline Blaize

  • Relax, God is make believe.
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 180
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2007, 03:35:44 PM »
Thanks for the input, keep it coming.

 I think I may be leaning towards the BMW as it is a much simpler machine. I did sort of know I would get a biased opinion here, but if the right wing comes along then you never know. My real fear is that with a wing I am going to have a complicated water cooled engine, and always wish I got the 2 cyl pushrod instead. and I think the beemer, being a little lighter on its feet, may be better for crummy roads. And god knows what I will encounter bombing around mainland europe, not to mention southern england.

 I had actually presumed that the BMW parts would be easier to find, but on the other hand I am going to be living within driving distance of DSS. And of course I am more of a honda fan anyway.

 Of course I am still 2-3 months from even begining the search but I am going back and forth about every 10 minites or so.
Living the American dream (in England).

Offline 333

  • Time for change
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,558
  • Mail List Member #162 - Call me Stan
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2007, 04:12:54 PM »
I've always drooled over the early wings.  And one hotlick mod was a manifold that allowed a single 2 or 4 barrel carb!
Go metric, every inch of the way!

CB350F0  "Scrouching Tiger"
CT70K0    "Sneezing Poodle"

www.alexandriaseaport.org

Offline sandcastcb750

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 394
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2007, 08:06:57 PM »
I know what you mean about the CB750; when the others want a ride.

Two up (2 people), the CB is not that comfortable over a long haul or bumpy city roads. For that reason, I picked up a 1982 Goldwing Interstate. I wanted the fairing and the ablility to put stuff in the trunk. The faring keeps my backstrain at a minimal at higher speeds. My wife likes it too. I must admit, the CB is more fun around town, though.

You can pick up a Goldwing cheap, meaning $1500 and up that will meet state inspection standards. They run like a car. Parts are cheap on ebay and some stuff is really nice. I got mine from Craigslist locally. Better to see/ride the bike and make a good decision. If you trust the ebay seller, some bikes are interesting there.

The downside of the Goldwings are they are a pain in the ass to work on; unlike a CB.

Beemers are nice too but an old boxer is like having the CB to me. The early ones I rode had a torque lift during acceleration and pinged alot with anything but the best gas. The later Beemers are better to me but then they seem more like a Goldwing with all the stuff. I suspect the Beemer is lighter in weight. A place called "Duncan's Beemers" is near me in Maynard Mass, he sells alot of used Beemers.

Either bike probably a good choice for you. Buy the best condition you can unless you enjoy projects.


Offline Blaize

  • Relax, God is make believe.
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 180
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2007, 01:11:26 AM »
I am a member of this forum.......I LOVE PROJECTS!!!!!!
Living the American dream (in England).

Offline sandcastcb750

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 394
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #8 on: July 16, 2007, 06:34:56 PM »
Then buy a project Goldwing. Much more difficult to work on.

Offline seaweb11

  • 1st Mate &
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,258
  • Ride & Smile
    • Playground Directory
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #9 on: July 16, 2007, 08:55:01 PM »
oops....wrong thread....I thought someone was dragging "Brimmer" from behind a bike ;D

Offline DarkRider

  • Nomad.or Drifter...Def not a
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,611
  • Lone Wolf.....Among the herd of sport bikers...
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2007, 10:58:36 PM »
oops....wrong thread....I thought someone was dragging "Brimmer" from behind a bike ;D

*Chokes on his pizza upon reading this*
'84 Chevy C10
'73 MGB Roadster
'69 Ford F250

Currently a rider without a bike

Quote from: heffay
so, you say just tie myself on with this... and steer w/ this?   ;D ;D  ok.  where's my goggles?   8)

Offline kghost

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,853
  • www.facebook.com/RetroMecanicaAustralia
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #11 on: July 18, 2007, 11:52:01 AM »
As an owner of both Goldwings (GL1000) and BMW (R90).....


Long rides on both bikes of the same vintage? Hands down Goldwing.

Ease of maint.? BMW.

Price of parts? Goldwing.

My gallery here: http://www.sohc4.us/gallery/v/members/personal/kghost/goldwing/



Stranger in a strange land

Offline ChevelleSSLS6

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 131
  • Member #4051
    • my myspace, yay.
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #12 on: July 18, 2007, 01:44:31 PM »




looks like a cafe racer, but with a more comfy seat... not a bad idea :)
"What about incomplete idiots?" -TwoTired
"What's a leakdown test?  I filled the cylinder that looks like this with some water and let it sit overnight. The water didn't go down any.  I thought that would tell me about the rings." -Dead Guy of AMCforums
 
1977 CB550f- sold
2007 Kawi EX650- curre

Offline Blaize

  • Relax, God is make believe.
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 180
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #13 on: July 18, 2007, 03:08:23 PM »
Yes but asside from the whole timing belt dance, wich one needs more attention so to speak?
Living the American dream (in England).

Offline kghost

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,853
  • www.facebook.com/RetroMecanicaAustralia
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #14 on: July 19, 2007, 11:36:34 PM »
Timing belts are dead simple and should not intimidate.

The carbs however are substantially harder to repair and tune then either the CB750 slide carbs or the Bing's on a Bemmer. Plus there are four rather than two.

Lots of wings out there suffering from poor carbs.
Stranger in a strange land

Offline sandcastcb750

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 394
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #15 on: July 20, 2007, 10:16:01 AM »
Most old Goldwings run great at high speed.

Slow speed jets are the problem with Goldwing 1100s. Just getting the carbs off the bike is a chore.

Buy a good running bike.

Offline Blaize

  • Relax, God is make believe.
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 180
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #16 on: July 20, 2007, 10:39:42 PM »
Well, against my better judgment I think I will look for a barely running GL1000. I find if you have to work to get it back on the road, you end up with a better machine in the end. I don't want to buy a "good one" and than spend damn near the ame money making sure everything is right, when I can buy a basketcase and know it needs it all. and this way I will end up knowing more about how it all works.

 And I think the wing's are prettier than the BMW's anyway
Living the American dream (in England).

Offline sandcastcb750

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 394
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2007, 07:14:12 AM »
Also, see if the Goldwing has a rattle during idle. Could carbs or could be worn primary chains that don't have a tensioner like the CB750. I am concerned about that now. My Wing rattles.

Offline Blaize

  • Relax, God is make believe.
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 180
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #18 on: July 21, 2007, 05:56:49 PM »
Hey thanks for the link to randakks. VERY interesting reading. I just blew 2 hours pouring over all of it. Now I am sure I am going to go with a wing, knowing there is good info and a decent parts supplier for them. That can make all the difference in the world.

 And just to clarify, while I can appreciate the benefits of the full dresser bikes, I am only interested in the gl1000's and the spoke wheel years at that. At 31 I am afraid i still need to look cool on it. And I don't want it "that"  heavy either. I had no idea those things in the 80's were pushing 800 pounds!!! no wonder they needed a reverse gear.
« Last Edit: July 21, 2007, 06:05:20 PM by Blaize »
Living the American dream (in England).

Offline sandcastcb750

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 394
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #19 on: July 22, 2007, 07:59:25 AM »
Good choice on the spoke early wing. I think they will be more easy to work on. They say that putting GL1100 carbs on a GL1100 wakes up the bike.

Offline medic09

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,666
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #20 on: July 22, 2007, 08:16:46 PM »
They say that putting GL1100 carbs on a GL1100 wakes up the bike.

HUH?

(I also find a bike runs better with the carbs on...)   ;D
Mordechai

'78 CB750K
'76 Triumph T160 Trident (rebuilding)
'07 aprilia Caponord

Santa Fe, NM

Offline sandcastcb750

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 394
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #21 on: July 23, 2007, 05:26:20 AM »
GL 1100 have four air-valves versus one on the GL 1000 carbs. Yea, they run much better on the bike..........if the bike is functional.

Offline ofreen

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,060
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #22 on: July 23, 2007, 09:56:43 PM »
I've worked on various GL1000s, 1100s, and 1200s belonging to friends.  I have grown to detest the things.  No offense to those that like Gold Wings, but give me an airhead Beemer any day.  If I could have only one bike, I'd keep my R100GS-PD. 

kghost's Wing is cool, tho.
Greg
'75 CB750F

"I would rather have questions I cannot answer than answers I cannot question." - Dr. Wei-Hock Soon

Offline sandcastcb750

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 394
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #23 on: July 24, 2007, 05:58:26 PM »
There are times when I detest my Goldwing too. However, on a long ride, you grow to love them.

I want to get that Goldwing single carb conversion. 4 suck.

fuzzybutt

  • Guest
Re: goldwing vs. airhead beemer
« Reply #24 on: July 24, 2007, 06:01:47 PM »
well as much as i like the goldwing i have got to say the airhead beemer is about the most indestructible bike ever built i think with the exception of some of the transmissions, (an easy fix)