A few people on here got on me about hacking up such a "nice bike". I thought, what am I missing? How is this a nice bike that should be restored? I still don't feel bad because I've seen (on here) what a nice original looks like.
I bought a $400 bike that didn't run, had a smashed tank, lower triple bent, rusty spokes, pitted wheels, cracked tires, bent gauges, crooked headlight (bent ears), half a seat pan, missing baffle, etc.. That's exactly what I was looking for!
As humans we always have and always will mistake our opinion for fact. IMO, that rear fender is what kept me from owning another 70s bike for the last 15yrs. IMO, UGLY. So, I leave you with this question: Would you have RESTORED this 1974 CB550K?